Exergic, economic and environmental impacts of natural gas and diesel in operation of combined cycle power plants

被引:54
作者
Vandani, Amin Mohammadi Khoshkar [1 ]
Joda, Fatemeh [1 ]
Boozarjomehry, Ramin Bozorgmehry [2 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ, AC, Fac Mech & Energy Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Sharif Univ Technol, Chem & Petr Engn Dept, Azadi St, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Combined cycle power plant; Exergy; Economic; Environment analysis; Life cycle assessment; Optimization; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; EXERGOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY; ELECTRICITY; EFFICIENCY; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2015.11.048
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Combined cycle power plants (CCPPs) play an important role in electricity production throughout the world. Their energy efficiency is relatively high and their production rates of greenhouse gases are considerably low. In a country like Iran with huge oil and gas resources, most CCPP's use natural gas as primary fuel and diesel as secondary fuel. In this study, effect of using diesel instead of natural gas for a selected power plant will be investigated in terms of exergy, economic and environmental impacts. The environmental evaluation is performed using life cycle assessment (LCA). In the second step, the operation of the plant will be optimized using exergy and economic objective functions. The results show that the exergy efficiency of the plant with natural gas as fuel is equal to 43.11%, while this efficiency with diesel will be 42.03%. Furthermore, the annual cost of plant using diesel is twice as that of plant using natural gas. Finally, diesel utilization leads to more contaminants production. Thus, environmental effects of diesel are much higher than that of natural gas. The optimization results demonstrate that in case of natural gas, exergy efficiency and annual cost of the power plant improve 234% and 4.99%, respectively. While these improvements for diesel are 2.36% and 1.97%. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 112
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Advanced exergy analysis of an electricity-generating facility using natural gas [J].
Acikkalp, Emin ;
Aras, Haydar ;
Hepbasli, Arif .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 82 :146-153
[2]   Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective optimization of combined cycle power plants [J].
Ahmadi, Pouria ;
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Rosen, Marc A. .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (10) :5886-5898
[3]   Energy and exergy analysis of a steam power plant in Jordan [J].
Aijundi, Isam H. .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 29 (2-3) :324-328
[4]   Greenhouse gas emission measurement and economic analysis of Iran natural gas fired power plants [J].
Alavijeh, H. Shahsavari ;
Kiyoumarsioskouei, A. ;
Asheri, M. H. ;
Naemi, S. ;
Alavije, H. Shahsavari ;
Tabrizi, H. Basirat .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 60 :200-207
[5]  
almasi A, 2011, P GLOB C GLOB WARM 2
[6]   Exergy analysis of a 420 MW combined cycle power plant [J].
Ameri, M. ;
Ahmadi, P. ;
Khanmohammadi, S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2008, 32 (02) :175-183
[7]   Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a steam power plant: A case study [J].
Ameri, Mohammad ;
Ahmadi, Pouria ;
Hamidi, Armita .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2009, 33 (05) :499-512
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1992, P INT C EFF COST OPT, P9
[9]   Techno-economic assessment of a Kalina cycle driven by a parabolic Trough solar collector [J].
Ashouri, Milad ;
Vandani, Amin Mohammadi Khoshkar ;
Mehrpooya, Mehdi ;
Ahmadi, Mohammad H. ;
Abdollahpour, Amir .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 105 :1328-1339
[10]   LCA of low-energy flats using the Eco-indicator 99 method: Impact of insulation materials [J].
Audenaert, Amaryllis ;
De Cleyn, Sven H. ;
Buyle, Matthias .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 47 :68-73