Assessment and Ranking of Climate Models in Arctic Sea Ice Cover Simulation: From CMIP5 to CMIP6

被引:50
|
作者
Shen, Zili [1 ,2 ]
Duan, Anmin [2 ,3 ]
Li, Dongliang [1 ]
Li, Jinxiao [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Meteorol Disaster, Joint Int Res Lab Climate & Environm Change,Colla, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, LASG, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, CAS Ctr Excellence Tibetan Plateau Earth Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Arctic; Sea ice; Coupled models; Model comparison; Model evaluation/performance; ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION; VARIABILITY; TRENDS; AMPLIFICATION; UNCERTAINTY; EVOLUTION; IMPACT; EXTENT; AOGCM;
D O I
10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0294.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The capability of 36 models participating in phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and their 24 CMIP5 counterparts in simulating the mean state and variability of Arctic sea ice cover for the period 1979-2014 is evaluated. In addition, a sea ice cover performance score for each CMIP5 and CMIP6 model is provided that can be used to reduce the spread in sea ice projections through applying weighted averages based on the ability of models to reproduce the historical sea ice state. Results show that the seasonal cycle of the Arctic sea ice extent (SIE) in the multimodel ensemble (MME) mean of the CMIP6 simulations agrees well with observations, with a MME mean error of less than 15% in any given month relative to the observations. CMIP6 has a smaller intermodel spread in climatological SIE values during summer months than its CMIP5 counterpart. In terms of the monthly SIE trends, the CMIP6 MME mean shows a substantial reduction in the positive bias relative to the observations compared with that of CMIP5. The spread of September SIE trends is very large, not only across different models but also across different ensemble members of the same model, indicating a strong influence of internal variability on SIE evolution. Based on the assumptions that the simulations of CMIP6 models are from the same distribution and that models have no bias in response to external forcing, we can infer that internal variability contributes to approximately 22% +/- 5% of the September SIE trend over the period 1979-2014.
引用
收藏
页码:3609 / 3627
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of Sea Ice Extent in CMIP6 With Comparison to Observations and CMIP5
    Shu, Qi
    Wang, Qiang
    Song, Zhenya
    Qiao, Fangli
    Zhao, Jiechen
    Chu, Min
    Li, Xinfang
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (09)
  • [2] Evaluation of Arctic sea ice simulation of CMIP6 models from China
    LI Jiaqi
    WANG Xiaochun
    WANG Ziqi
    ZHAO Liqing
    WANG Jin
    Advances in Polar Science, 2022, 33 (03) : 220 - 234
  • [3] Assessment of Arctic sea ice and surface climate conditions in nine CMIP6 climate models
    Henke, Martin
    Cassalho, Felicio
    Miesse, Tyler
    Ferreira, Celso M.
    Zhang, Jinlun
    Ravens, Thomas M.
    ARCTIC ANTARCTIC AND ALPINE RESEARCH, 2023, 55 (01)
  • [4] Multi-Aspect Assessment of CMIP6 Models for Arctic Sea Ice Simulation
    Long, Mengyuan
    Zhang, Lujun
    Hu, Siyu
    Qian, Shimeng
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (04) : 1515 - 1529
  • [5] The Arctic Surface Climate in CMIP6: Status and Developments since CMIP5
    Davy, Richard
    Outten, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2020, 33 (18) : 8047 - 8068
  • [6] Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate extremes
    Chen, Huopo
    Sun, Jianqi
    Lin, Wenqing
    Xu, Huiwen
    SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2020, 65 (17) : 1415 - 1418
  • [7] Arctic Sea Ice in CMIP6
    Notz, Dirk
    Doerr, Jakob
    Bailey, David A.
    Blockley, Ed
    Bushuk, Mitchell
    Debernard, Jens Boldingh
    Dekker, Evelien
    DeRepentigny, Patricia
    Docquier, David
    Fuckar, Neven S.
    Fyfe, John C.
    Jahn, Alexandra
    Holland, Marika
    Hunke, Elizabeth
    Iovino, Doroteaciro
    Khosravi, Narges
    Madec, Gurvan
    Massonnet, Francois
    O'Farrell, Siobhan
    Petty, Alek
    Rana, Arun
    Roach, Lettie
    Rosenblum, Erica
    Rousset, Clement
    Semmler, Tido
    Stroeve, Julienne
    Toyoda, Takahiro
    Tremblay, Bruno
    Tsujino, Hiroyuki
    Vancoppenolle, Martin
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (10)
  • [8] The improvements of sea surface temperature simulation over China Offshore Sea in present climate from CMIP5 to CMIP6 models
    Rong Deng
    Shaobo Qiao
    Xian Zhu
    Tianyun Dong
    Guolin Feng
    Wenjie Dong
    Climate Dynamics, 2023, 61 : 5111 - 5130
  • [9] Revisiting the Influence of ENSO on the Arctic Stratosphere in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Hu, Jinggao
    Shen, Yifan
    Deng, Jiechun
    Jia, Yanpei
    Wang, Zixu
    Li, Anqi
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (05)
  • [10] The improvements of sea surface temperature simulation over China Offshore Sea in present climate from CMIP5 to CMIP6 models
    Deng, Rong
    Qiao, Shaobo
    Zhu, Xian
    Dong, Tianyun
    Feng, Guolin
    Dong, Wenjie
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2023, 61 (11-12) : 5111 - 5130