Outcome of Re-Using radiofrequency ablation catheter for varicose veins treatment

被引:2
作者
Stephen, Edwin [1 ]
Kota, Albert Abhinay [2 ]
John, Deepak George [2 ]
Samuel, Vimalin [2 ]
Selvaraj, Andrew Dheepak [2 ]
Premkumar, Prabhu [2 ]
Agarwal, Sunil [2 ]
机构
[1] Sultan Qaboos Univ Hosp, Div Surg, Vasc Surg Unit, Muscat, Oman
[2] Christian Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Ablation; Closure Fast; radiofrequency; radiofrequency ablation; varicose veins; VNUS; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; SAPHENOUS-VEIN; SURGERY; TRIALS;
D O I
10.4103/ijves.ijves_30_20
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate the success of re-use by assessing the recanalization rates following radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with Closure Fast (R) catheter in patients with symptomatic varicose veins. Methods: This retrospective study approved by the institutional review board analyzed the occlusion rates of the great saphenous vein (GSV) in patients who underwent RFA between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016. A record of the number of times the RFA catheter was re-used was maintained. The catheter was used for a maximum of five systems. Follow-up was performed postoperatively at 1 week and 6 months with an ultrasound to assess failure by looking for recanalization. Results: In this study, 272 GSV endoablations (RFA) were performed in 238 patients. The mean age was 47.68 (standard deviation +/- 13.05). Majority of the patients were male (76.9%). 27.3% (73 GSV) of the venous systems received a first fire with the RFA catheter. At the first follow-up on week 1, 97.7% (266 GSV systems) had complete occlusion, 2.3% (6 GSV systems) had partial recanalization, and none had complete failure. Recanalization rates at 1 week with 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th re-use were 0%, 2%, 2%. 4.1%, and 3.8%, respectively. At 6-month postoperative follow-up, 96.5% (250) had complete occlusion, 2.7% (7) had partial recanalization, and 0.8% (2) had complete recanalization. Recanalization rates at 6 weeks with 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th re-use were 1.4%, 2.1%, 2.3%. 6.4%, 5.9% respectively. There was no statistical significance with the recanalization rates at 1st week and at 6 weeks. 4.2% (10) of the patients were lost to follow-up. None of the patients had any complications. Conclusion: The results of GSV occlusion rates are encouraging when the RFA catheter was re-used and cut the cost of treatment substantially, thereby making RFA ablation more affordable to the common human.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 157
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Radiofrequency ablation: an assessment of clinical and cost efficacy
    Aherne, T.
    McHugh, S. M.
    Tashkandi, W.
    Byrne, J.
    Aljabi, Y.
    Moneley, D.
    Leahy, A.
    Naughton, P.
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 185 (01) : 107 - 110
  • [2] Recanalization After Endovenous Thermal Ablation
    Alsheekh, Ahmad
    Hingorani, Anil
    Ascher, Enrico
    Arshina, Afsha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 63 (06) : 133S - 134S
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, NATL HLTH PROFILE 20
  • [4] Results of endovenous ClosureFast treatment for varicose veins in an outpatient setting
    Bisang, U.
    Meier, T. O.
    Enzler, M.
    Thalhammer, C.
    Husmann, M.
    Amann-Vesti, B. R.
    [J]. PHLEBOLOGY, 2012, 27 (03) : 118 - 123
  • [5] Systematic review, network meta-analysis and exploratory cost-effectiveness model of randomized trials of minimally invasive techniques versus surgery for varicose veins
    Carroll, C.
    Hummel, S.
    Leaviss, J.
    Ren, S.
    Stevens, J. W.
    Cantrell, A.
    Michaels, J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (09) : 1040 - 1052
  • [6] ASSOCIATION FOR ACADEMIC SURGERY Economic and Outcomes-Based Analysis of the Care of Symptomatic Varicose Veins
    Eidson, J. Leigh, III
    Atkins, Marvin D.
    Bohannon, W. Todd
    Marrocco, Christopher J.
    Buckley, Clifford J.
    Bush, Ruth L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 168 (01) : 5 - 8
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness of traditional and endovenous treatments for varicose veins
    Gohel, M. S.
    Epstein, D. M.
    Davies, A. H.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (12) : 1815 - 1823
  • [8] Predictors of Recanalization of the Great Saphenous Vein in Randomized Controlled Trials 1 Year After Endovenous Thermal Ablation
    Van der Velden, S. K.
    Lawaetz, M.
    De Maeseneer, M. G. R.
    Hollestein, L.
    Nijsten, T.
    van den Bos, R. R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 52 (02) : 234 - 241
  • [9] Endovenous Laser Treatment of Saphenous Vein Reflux: How Much Energy Do We Need to Prevent Recanalizations?
    Vuylsteke, Marc
    Liekens, Koen
    Moons, Peter
    Mordon, Serge
    [J]. VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 42 (02) : 141 - 149
  • [10] Editor's Choice - Management of Chronic Venous Disease Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS)
    Wittens, C.
    Davies, A. H.
    Bwkgaard, N.
    Broholm, R.
    Cavezzi, A.
    Chastanet, S.
    De Wolf, M.
    Eggen, C.
    Giannoukas, A.
    Gohel, M.
    Kakkos, S.
    Lawson, J.
    Noppeney, T.
    Onida, S.
    Pittaluga, P.
    Thomis, S.
    Toonder, I.
    Vuylsteke, M.
    Kolh, P.
    de Borst, G. J.
    Chakfe, N.
    Debus, S.
    Hinchliffe, R.
    Koncar, I.
    Lindholt, J.
    de Ceniga, M. V.
    Vermassen, F.
    Verzini, F.
    De Maeseneer, M. G.
    Blomgren, L.
    Hartung, O.
    Kalodiki, E.
    Korten, E.
    Li, M. Lug
    Naylor, R.
    Nicolini, P.
    Rosales, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 49 (06) : 678 - 737