On the matching of top-down knowledge with sensory input in the perception of ambiguous speech

被引:3
作者
Eulitz, C. [1 ]
Hannemann, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Konstanz, Dept Linguist, Constance, Germany
来源
BMC NEUROSCIENCE | 2010年 / 11卷
关键词
GAMMA-BAND; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; RECOGNITION LEXICON; SENTENCE CONTEXT; BRAIN ACTIVITY; LANGUAGE; RESPONSES; ATTENTION; HUMANS; OBJECT;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2202-11-67
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: How does the brain repair obliterated speech and cope with acoustically ambivalent situations? A widely discussed possibility is to use top-down information for solving the ambiguity problem. In the case of speech, this may lead to a match of bottom-up sensory input with lexical expectations resulting in resonant states which are reflected in the induced gamma-band activity (GBA). Methods: In the present EEG study, we compared the subject's pre-attentive GBA responses to obliterated speech segments presented after a series of correct words. The words were a minimal pair in German and differed with respect to the degree of specificity of segmental phonological information. Results: The induced GBA was larger when the expected lexical information was phonologically fully specified compared to the underspecified condition. Thus, the degree of specificity of phonological information in the mental lexicon correlates with the intensity of the matching process of bottom-up sensory input with lexical information. Conclusions: These results together with those of a behavioural control experiment support the notion of multi-level mechanisms involved in the repair of deficient speech. The delineated alignment of pre-existing knowledge with sensory input is in accordance with recent ideas about the role of internal forward models in speech perception.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Top-down contextual knowledge guides visual attention in infancy
    Tummeltshammer, Kristen
    Amso, Dima
    DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2018, 21 (04)
  • [22] Action potential influences spatial perception: Evidence for genuine top-down effects on perception
    Witt, Jessica K.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2017, 24 (04) : 999 - 1021
  • [23] Flexible top-down control in the interaction between working memory and perception
    Teng, Chunyue
    Fulvio, Jacqueline M.
    Jiang, Jiefeng
    Postle, Bradley R.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2022, 22 (11):
  • [24] Dissociating top-down attentional control from selective perception and action
    Hopfinger, JB
    Woldorff, MG
    Fletcher, EM
    Mangun, GR
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2001, 39 (12) : 1277 - 1291
  • [25] Involvement of top-down networks in the perception of facial emotions: A magnetoencephalographic investigation
    Kajal, Diljit Singh
    Fioravanti, Chiara
    Elshahabi, Adham
    Ruiz, Sergio
    Sitaram, Ranganatha
    Braun, Christoph
    NEUROIMAGE, 2020, 222
  • [26] Temporal relation between top-down and bottom-up processing in lexical tone perception
    Shuai, Lan
    Gong, Tao
    FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
  • [27] Integrating motion information across sensory modalities: the role of top-down factors
    Soto-Faraco, Salvador
    Kingstone, Alan
    Spence, Charles
    VISUAL PERCEPTION, PT 2: FUNDAMENTALS OF AWARENESS: MULTI-SENSORY INTEGRATION AND HIGH-ORDER PERCEPTION, 2006, 155 : 273 - 286
  • [28] Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms as reflected by beta and gamma oscillations in speech perception: An individual-difference approach
    Ou, Jinghua
    Law, Sam-Po
    BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2019, 199
  • [29] An ERP Study of Good Production vis-a-vis Poor Perception of Tones in Cantonese: Implications for Top-Down Speech Processing
    Law, Sam-Po
    Fung, Roxana
    Kung, Carmen
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (01):
  • [30] Auditory hallucinations, top-down processing and language perception: a general population study
    de Boer, J. N.
    Linszen, M. M. J.
    de Vries, J.
    Schutte, M. J. L.
    Begemann, M. J. H.
    Heringa, S. M.
    Bohlken, M. M.
    Hugdahl, K.
    Aleman, A.
    Wijnen, F. N. K.
    Sommer, I. E. C.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 49 (16) : 2772 - 2780