Data consistency criterion for selecting parameters for k-space-based reconstruction in parallel imaging

被引:15
|
作者
Nana, Roger [1 ]
Hu, Xiaoping [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Georgia Inst Technol, Wallace H Coulter Dept Biomed Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Parallel imaging; GRAPPA; Kernel support selection; TGRAPPA; Calibrating data frames selection; Reconstruction error; Image reconstruction; Artifact reduction; GRAPPA RECONSTRUCTION; T GRAPPA; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2009.05.047
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
k-space-based reconstruction in parallel imaging depends on the reconstruction kernel setting, including its support. An optimal choice of the kernel depends on the calibration data, coil geometry and signal-to-noise ratio, as well as the criterion used. In this work, data consistency, imposed by the shift invariance requirement of the kernel, is introduced as a goodness measure of k-space-based reconstruction in parallel imaging and demonstrated. Data consistency error (DCE) is calculated as the sum of squared difference between the acquired signals and their estimates obtained based on the interpolation of the estimated missing data. A resemblance between DCE and the mean square error in the reconstructed image was found, demonstrating DCE's potential as a metric for comparing or choosing reconstructions. When used for selecting the kernel support for generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) reconstruction and the set of frames for calibration as well as the kernel support in temporal GRAPPA reconstruction, DCE led to improved images over existing methods. Data consistency error is efficient to evaluate, robust for selecting reconstruction parameters and suitable for characterizing and optimizing k-space-based reconstruction in parallel imaging. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 128
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Optimized k-Space Configuration for Parallel MRI Reconstruction
    Pugachevskii, M. A.
    Polyakov, A. G.
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING-MEDITSINSKAYA TEKNIKA, 2020, 54 (01): : 33 - 36
  • [32] An Optimized k-Space Configuration for Parallel MRI Reconstruction
    M. A. Pugachevskii
    A. G. Polyakov
    Biomedical Engineering, 2020, 54 : 33 - 36
  • [33] Selecting the regularization parameters in high-dimensional panel data models: Consistency and efficiency
    Ando, Tomohiro
    Bai, Jushan
    ECONOMETRIC REVIEWS, 2018, 37 (03) : 183 - 211
  • [34] Blind Parallel MRI Reconstruction with Arbitrary k-Space Trajectories
    Yu, Chengpu
    Zhang, Cishen
    Xie, Lihua
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 IEEE 8TH CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA), 2013, : 742 - 746
  • [35] Reconstruction in image space using basis functions for partially parallel imaging
    Li, Yu
    Vijayakumar, Sathya
    Huang, Feng
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 26 (04) : 461 - 473
  • [36] Model-based reconstruction of undersampled diffusion tensor k-space data
    Welsh, Christopher L.
    DiBella, Edward V. R.
    Adluru, Ganesh
    Hsu, Edward W.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2013, 70 (02) : 429 - 440
  • [37] Partition-based k-space synthesis for multi-contrast parallel imaging
    Huang, Yuxia
    Wu, Zhonghui
    Xu, Xiaoling
    Zhang, Minghui
    Wang, Shanshan
    Liu, Qiegen
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2025, 117
  • [38] K-space and image domain collaborative energy-based model for parallel MRI reconstruction
    Tu, Zongjiang
    Jiang, Chen
    Guan, Yu
    Liu, Jijun
    Liu, Qiegen
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 99 : 110 - 122
  • [39] Fractional Laplacians viscoacoustic wavefield modeling with k-space-based time-stepping error compensating scheme
    Wang, Ning
    Zhu, Tieyuan
    Zhou, Hui
    Chen, Hanming
    Zhao, Xuebin
    Tian, Yukun
    GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 85 (01) : T1 - T13
  • [40] Auto-Calibrated Parallel Imaging Reconstruction for Arbitrary Trajectories Using k-Space Sparse Matrices (kSPA)
    Liu, Chunlei
    Zhang, Jian
    Moseley, Michael E.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2010, 29 (03) : 950 - 959