Patient explanations for non-attendance at structured diabetes education sessions for newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study

被引:68
作者
Winkley, K. [1 ]
Evwierhoma, C. [1 ]
Amiel, S. A. [2 ]
Lempp, H. K. [3 ]
Ismail, K. [1 ]
Forbes, A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Dept Psychol Med, London WC2R 2LS, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Sch Med, Dept Diabet & Nutr Sci, London WC2R 2LS, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Sch Med, Dept Rheumatol, London WC2R 2LS, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Florence Nightingale Sch Nursing & Midwifery, London WC2R 2LS, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SELF-MANAGEMENT PROGRAM; PRIMARY-CARE; DESMOND PROGRAM; PEOPLE; POPULATION; LONDON;
D O I
10.1111/dme.12556
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AimTo determine the reasons for non-attendance at structured education sessions among people with a recent diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes. MethodsThis was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews to elicit the main themes explaining non-attendance. A thematic framework method was applied to analyse the data. People who had not attended structured education were recruited from a population cohort of newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes from South London (the South London Diabetes cohort study), UK. ResultsA sample of 30 people was interviewed. Three main themes emerged from the qualitative data explaining non-attendance at structured education: (1) lack of information/perceived benefit of the programme (e.g. not being informed about the course by their health professional); (2) unmet personal preferences (e.g. parking, timing); and (3) shame and stigma of diabetes (e.g. not wishing to tell others of diabetes diagnosis). ConclusionThis is the first time that reasons for non-attendance have been explored in depth among people who have newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes. Novel reasons identified included non-attendance because of shame and stigma of diabetes. To improve uptake at structured education we need to: consider how health professionals in primary care communicate with their patients on the subject of structured diabetes education; offer alternatives to the traditional group education format; and understand that diabetes is associated with health-related stigma, which may affect participation. What's new? <list list-type="bulleted" id="dme12556-list-0001"> This is the first time that reasons for non-attendance at structured education sessions have been explored in depth among people who have newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes. Three themes explaining non-attendance were identified. The results of this study add an additional theme explaining non-attendance: shame and stigma of diabetes, e.g. not wanting to share diabetes diagnosis with other people. Improved uptake of structured education may involve: primary care health professionals discussing the benefits of structured diabetes education with their patients; offering alternatives to group education; and considering the impact that diabetes-related stigma has on participation.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 128
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], TYP 2 DIAB NEW AG
  • [2] FREQUENCY AND DETERMINANTS OF DIABETES PATIENT EDUCATION AMONG ADULTS IN THE US POPULATION
    COONROD, BA
    BETSCHART, J
    HARRIS, MI
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1994, 17 (08) : 852 - 858
  • [3] Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial
    Davies, M. J.
    Heller, S.
    Skinner, T. C.
    Campbell, M. J.
    Carey, M. E.
    Cradock, S.
    Dallosso, H. M.
    Daly, H.
    Doherty, Y.
    Eaton, S.
    Fox, C.
    Oliver, L.
    Rantell, K.
    Rayman, G.
    Khunti, K.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7642): : 491 - 495
  • [4] de-Graft Aikins A, 2006, J COMMUNITY APPL SOC, V16, P426
  • [5] Structured patient education: the Diabetes X-PERT Programme makes a difference
    Deakin, T. A.
    Cade, J. E.
    Williams, R.
    Greenwood, D. C.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2006, 23 (09) : 944 - 954
  • [6] Deakin T, 2011, PRACT DIABETES, V28, P1
  • [7] Reaching those most in need: a review of diabetes self-management interventions in disadvantaged populations
    Eakin, EG
    Bull, SS
    Glasgow, RE
    Mason, M
    [J]. DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2002, 18 (01) : 26 - 35
  • [8] Delivering the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cost effectiveness analysis
    Gillett, M.
    Dallosso, H. M.
    Dixon, S.
    Brennan, A.
    Carey, M. E.
    Campbell, M. J.
    Heller, S.
    Khunti, K.
    Skinner, T. C.
    Davies, M. J.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 341
  • [9] Glasgow R E, 1991, Diabetes Educ, V17, P376, DOI 10.1177/014572179101700509
  • [10] Griffiths C, 2005, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V55, P831