Patient explanations for non-attendance at structured diabetes education sessions for newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study

被引:69
作者
Winkley, K. [1 ]
Evwierhoma, C. [1 ]
Amiel, S. A. [2 ]
Lempp, H. K. [3 ]
Ismail, K. [1 ]
Forbes, A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Dept Psychol Med, London WC2R 2LS, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Sch Med, Dept Diabet & Nutr Sci, London WC2R 2LS, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Sch Med, Dept Rheumatol, London WC2R 2LS, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Florence Nightingale Sch Nursing & Midwifery, London WC2R 2LS, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SELF-MANAGEMENT PROGRAM; PRIMARY-CARE; DESMOND PROGRAM; PEOPLE; POPULATION; LONDON;
D O I
10.1111/dme.12556
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AimTo determine the reasons for non-attendance at structured education sessions among people with a recent diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes. MethodsThis was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews to elicit the main themes explaining non-attendance. A thematic framework method was applied to analyse the data. People who had not attended structured education were recruited from a population cohort of newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes from South London (the South London Diabetes cohort study), UK. ResultsA sample of 30 people was interviewed. Three main themes emerged from the qualitative data explaining non-attendance at structured education: (1) lack of information/perceived benefit of the programme (e.g. not being informed about the course by their health professional); (2) unmet personal preferences (e.g. parking, timing); and (3) shame and stigma of diabetes (e.g. not wishing to tell others of diabetes diagnosis). ConclusionThis is the first time that reasons for non-attendance have been explored in depth among people who have newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes. Novel reasons identified included non-attendance because of shame and stigma of diabetes. To improve uptake at structured education we need to: consider how health professionals in primary care communicate with their patients on the subject of structured diabetes education; offer alternatives to the traditional group education format; and understand that diabetes is associated with health-related stigma, which may affect participation. What's new? <list list-type="bulleted" id="dme12556-list-0001"> This is the first time that reasons for non-attendance at structured education sessions have been explored in depth among people who have newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes. Three themes explaining non-attendance were identified. The results of this study add an additional theme explaining non-attendance: shame and stigma of diabetes, e.g. not wanting to share diabetes diagnosis with other people. Improved uptake of structured education may involve: primary care health professionals discussing the benefits of structured diabetes education with their patients; offering alternatives to group education; and considering the impact that diabetes-related stigma has on participation.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 128
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], TYP 2 DIAB NEW AG
[2]   FREQUENCY AND DETERMINANTS OF DIABETES PATIENT EDUCATION AMONG ADULTS IN THE US POPULATION [J].
COONROD, BA ;
BETSCHART, J ;
HARRIS, MI .
DIABETES CARE, 1994, 17 (08) :852-858
[3]   Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial [J].
Davies, M. J. ;
Heller, S. ;
Skinner, T. C. ;
Campbell, M. J. ;
Carey, M. E. ;
Cradock, S. ;
Dallosso, H. M. ;
Daly, H. ;
Doherty, Y. ;
Eaton, S. ;
Fox, C. ;
Oliver, L. ;
Rantell, K. ;
Rayman, G. ;
Khunti, K. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7642) :491-495
[4]  
de-Graft Aikins A, 2006, J COMMUNITY APPL SOC, V16, P426
[5]   Structured patient education: the Diabetes X-PERT Programme makes a difference [J].
Deakin, T. A. ;
Cade, J. E. ;
Williams, R. ;
Greenwood, D. C. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2006, 23 (09) :944-954
[6]  
Deakin T, 2011, PRACT DIABETES, V28, P1
[7]   Reaching those most in need: a review of diabetes self-management interventions in disadvantaged populations [J].
Eakin, EG ;
Bull, SS ;
Glasgow, RE ;
Mason, M .
DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2002, 18 (01) :26-35
[8]   Delivering the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cost effectiveness analysis [J].
Gillett, M. ;
Dallosso, H. M. ;
Dixon, S. ;
Brennan, A. ;
Carey, M. E. ;
Campbell, M. J. ;
Heller, S. ;
Khunti, K. ;
Skinner, T. C. ;
Davies, M. J. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 341
[9]  
Glasgow R E, 1991, Diabetes Educ, V17, P376, DOI 10.1177/014572179101700509
[10]  
Griffiths C, 2005, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V55, P831