The Masculinity Contingency Scale (MCS): Scale Development and Psychometric Properties

被引:50
作者
Burkley, Melissa [1 ]
Wong, Y. Joel [2 ]
Bell, Angela C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Psychol, 116 North Murray, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Bloomington, Dept Counseling & Educ Psychol, Bloomington, IN USA
关键词
masculinity; contingencies of self-worth; scale development; sexism; ROLE CONFLICT SCALE; COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH; SELF-ESTEEM SCALE; PRECARIOUS MANHOOD; CONSTRUCT-VALIDATION; PHYSICAL AGGRESSION; NORMS INVENTORY-46; AMBIVALENT SEXISM; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; WOMEN SCALE;
D O I
10.1037/a0039211
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article reports the development and psychometric properties of the Masculinity Contingency Scale (MCS), a measure designed to assess the extent that a man's self-worth is derived from his sense of masculinity. Across 4 studies, results provided support for this new measure's reliability and validity. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses provided support for a hierarchical model with a superordinate factor (masculinity contingency) and 2 factors that correspond to 2 subscales: MCS-Threat (self-worth is threatened by a lack of masculinity) and MCS-Boost (self-worth is boosted by confirmation of masculinity). Evidence for good reliability was demonstrated by high alpha coefficients and test-retest reliability. Evidence for convergent, discriminant, criterion-related, and incremental validity was demonstrated by testing the associations between the MCS and existing masculinity measures, sexism measures, homophobia, and trait self-esteem. The results indicated that, in general, high masculinity contingency scores were associated with negative social and personal outcomes. Furthermore, MSC-Threat scores were more strongly associated with these negative outcomes than MCS-Boost scores. These findings are discussed in light of the conceptual, methodological, and practical contributions of the MCS.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 125
页数:13
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1890, THE PRINCIPLES OF PS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, UNDERSTANDING NEW ST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CALCULATION TEST DIF
[4]  
Baumeister R F., 2001, Review of General Psychology, V5, P323, DOI [10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323, DOI 10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323, 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323]
[5]   MEASUREMENT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ANDROGYNY [J].
BEM, SL .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 42 (02) :155-162
[6]   Homophobia and physical aggression toward homosexual and heterosexual individuals [J].
Bernat, JA ;
Calhoun, KS ;
Adams, HE ;
Zeichner, A .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 110 (01) :179-187
[7]   CULTURAL MYTHS AND SUPPORTS FOR RAPE [J].
BURT, MR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 38 (02) :217-230
[8]   When Friends Make You Blue: The Role of Friendship Contingent Self-Esteem in Predicting Self-Esteem and Depressive Symptoms [J].
Cambron, M. Janelle ;
Acitelli, Linda K. ;
Steinberg, Lynne .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2010, 36 (03) :384-397
[9]  
CASSIDY T, 1989, J OCCUP PSYCHOL, V62, P301
[10]   The Role of Restrictive Emotionality, Trait Anger, and Masculinity Threat in Men's Perpetration of Physical Aggression [J].
Cohn, Amy M. ;
Seibert, L. Alana ;
Zeichner, Amos .
PSYCHOLOGY OF MEN & MASCULINITIES, 2009, 10 (03) :218-224