Does R&D spur productivity growth in Australia's broadacre agriculture? A semi-parametric smooth coefficient approach

被引:3
作者
Khan, Farid [1 ]
Salim, Ruhul [2 ]
Sun, Kai [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rajshahi, Dept Econ, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
[2] Curtin Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Shanghai Univ, Sch Econ, Room 352,Econ & Management Bldg, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
关键词
Broadacre Agriculture; semi-parametric smooth coefficient model; productivity; research and development; C14; C23; D24; NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION; INFERENCE; INVESTMENT; VARIABLES; RETURNS; MODEL; PANEL;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2018.1470316
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article analyses the role of research and development (R&D) in Australia's broadacre farming by using the semi-parametric smooth coefficient model. While the conventional production function approach only captures the direct effects of R&D, this methodology captures both the direct impact of a change in R&D on output and the indirect impact through changes in efficiency of use of factor inputs in the production process. Moreover, technical inefficiency is introduced in the model allowing it as a function of R&D. Using a unique state-level dataset covering the period 1995-2007, this empirical study finds that once both the direct and indirect effects are taken into consideration, R&D investments significantly increase outputs. The results also show that there are substantial variations in the effects of R&D on output across the state-level average farm through technology parameters as well as through technical inefficiency. Such variations need to be taken into account when designing policies for investing public R&D in agriculture.
引用
收藏
页码:5074 / 5091
页数:18
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Efficient estimation of a semiparametric partially linear varying coefficient model [J].
Ahmad, I ;
Leelahanon, S ;
Li, Q .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2005, 33 (01) :258-283
[2]   Productivity growth and the effects of R&D in African agriculture [J].
Alene, Arega D. .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 41 (3-4) :223-238
[3]   The Economic Returns to U.S. Public Agricultural Research [J].
Alston, Julian M. ;
Andersen, Matthew A. ;
James, Jennifer S. ;
Pardey, Philip G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 93 (05) :1257-1277
[4]   Interpreting and testing the scaling property in models where inefficiency depends on firm characteristics [J].
Alvarez, A ;
Amsler, C ;
Orea, L ;
Schmidt, P .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2006, 25 (03) :201-212
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 142 ABARES
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, YB AUSTR
[7]   Is U.S. Agricultural Productivity Growth Slowing? [J].
Ball, Eldon ;
Schimmelpfennig, David ;
Wang, Sun Ling .
APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY, 2013, 35 (03) :435-450
[8]   Is Tinkering with Institutional Quality a Panacea for Firm Performance? Insights from a Semiparametric Approach to Modeling Firm Performance [J].
Bhaumik, Sumon Kumar ;
Dimova, Ralitza ;
Kumbhakar, Subal C. ;
Sun, Kai .
REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2018, 22 (01) :1-22
[9]   Nonparametric estimation of varying coefficient dynamic panel data models [J].
Cai, Zongwu ;
Li, Qi .
ECONOMETRIC THEORY, 2008, 24 (05) :1321-1342
[10]   Functional coefficient instrumental variables models [J].
Cai, Zongwu ;
Das, Mitali ;
Xiong, Huaiyu ;
Wu, Xizhi .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2006, 133 (01) :207-241