Preference and pertinence:: Praxeological analysis of types of compromise in a parliamentary context -: A look at an debate in Egypt

被引：6

作者：

Ferrié, JN ^{[1
]}

Dupret, B ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Ambasade France & Egypte, CEDEJ, Serv Valise Diplomat, F-75351 Paris 07, France

来源：

SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SUR LES SCIENCES SOCIALES | 2004年 / 43卷 / 02期

关键词：

compromise; ethnomethodology; hearings; parliament; rational choice;

D O I：

10.1177/0539018404042582

中图分类号：

G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];

学科分类号：

1205 ; 120501 ;

摘要：

Taking as its departure point an Egyptian parliamentary debate, this article shows, first of all, that rational-choice theory cannot describe the making of a compromise; and, second, that the re-appraisal of preferences does not imply a change of opinion after the debate. It argues instead that the praxeological approach is more suitable for describing this dynamic.

引用

页码：263 / 290

页数：28