Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the postoperative pathology of locally advanced cervical squamous cell carcinomas: 1:1 propensity score matching analysis

被引:3
作者
Li, Pengfei [1 ]
Fang, Ziyu [1 ]
Li, Weili [1 ]
Hao, Min [2 ]
Wang, Wuliang [3 ]
Kang, Shan [4 ]
Guo, Jianxin [5 ]
Yang, Ying [6 ]
Ni, Yan [7 ]
Zhao, Weidong [8 ]
Lu, Anwei [9 ]
Ling, Bin [10 ]
Li, Donglin [11 ]
Lang, Jinghe [12 ]
Chen, Chunlin [1 ]
Liu, Ping [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Nan Fang Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 1838 Guangzhou Ave, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Shanxi Med Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Taiyuan, Shangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[4] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 4, Dept Gynecol, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[5] Army Med Univ, Daping Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[6] Army Med Univ, Xinqiao Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[7] Yuncheng Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Yuncheng, Peoples R China
[8] Anhui Canc Hosp, Dept Gynaecol, Hefei, Peoples R China
[9] Matern & Child Care Hosp Guizhou Prov, Dept Gynecol, Guiyang, Peoples R China
[10] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[11] Guizhou Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Guiyang, Peoples R China
[12] Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
EJSO | 2021年 / 47卷 / 05期
关键词
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Locally advanced; Cervical squamous cell carcinomas; Postoperative pathology; PELVIC LYMPH-NODES; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; CANCER; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.013
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on postoperative pathology for stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: Postoperative pathology was compared between patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy (NACT group) and patients who received upfront radical hysterectomy (URH group). Then, patients in the NACT group were divided into a chemotherapy-sensitive group and a chemotherapy-insensitive group according to their response to chemotherapy. Results: After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), the positive rates of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (7.9% vs 17.7%, P = 0.001) and cervical deep stromal invasion (60.4% vs 76.2%, P < 0.001) in the NACT group were significantly lower than those in the URH group, while the positive rates of parametrial invasion, lymph node metastasis, and vaginal margin invasion were not significantly different between the two groups. The rate of positive lymph node metastasis in the chemotherapy-sensitive group was significantly lower than that in the URH group (18.1% vs 26.5%, P = 0.037). Conclusion: Among patients with stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical squamous cell carcinomas, NACT can reduce the positive rate of intermediate-risk factors, such as deep cervical stromal invasion and LVSI, but cannot reduce the positive rate of high-risk factors. For patients who are chemotherapy sensitive, NACT can reduce the positive rate of lymph node metastasis. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1069 / 1074
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Al Gongalcz-Mardn, 2018, GYNECOL ONCOL, V110, pS36
  • [2] Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation in locally advanced cervical cancer
    Alexandre Silva de Azevedo, Carla Rameri
    Santos Thuler, Luiz Claudio
    Gonsalves de Mello, Maria Julia
    de Oliveira Lima, Jurema Telles
    Fassizoli da Fonte, Ana Luiza
    Santos Fontao, Diogenes Fernando
    Gomes Carneiro, Vandre Cabral
    Cabral Chang, Tien Man
    Ferreira, Carlos Gil
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 146 (03) : 560 - 565
  • [3] Adjuvant chemotherapy after primary treatments for cervical cancer: a critical point of view and review of the literature
    Angioli, Roberto
    Luvero, Daniela
    Aloisi, Alessia
    Capriglione, Stella
    Gennari, Paolo
    Linciano, Francesca
    Destri, Marta Li
    Scaletta, Giuseppe
    Montera, Roberto
    Plotti, Francesco
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2014, 14 (04) : 431 - 439
  • [4] Comparison of WHO, RECIST 1.1, EORTC, and PERCIST criteria in the evaluation of treatment response in malignant solid tumors
    Aras, Mustafa
    Erdil, Tanju Y.
    Dane, Faysal
    Gungor, Serkan
    Ones, Tunc
    Dede, Fuat
    Inanir, Sabahat
    Turoglu, Halil T.
    [J]. NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 37 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [5] Long-term survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer
    Benedetti-Panici, P
    Greggi, S
    Scambia, G
    Amoroso, M
    Salerno, MG
    Maneschi, F
    Cutillo, G
    Paratore, MP
    Scorpiglione, N
    Mancuso, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 (03) : 341 - 346
  • [6] Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study
    Chen, Biliang
    Ji, Mei
    Li, Pengfei
    Liu, Ping
    Zou, Wei
    Zhao, Zhao
    Qu, Bo
    Li, Zhiqiang
    Bin, Xiaonong
    Lang, Jinghe
    Wang, Hailin
    Chen, Chunlin
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 157 (02) : 429 - 436
  • [7] Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods
    Ferlay, J.
    Colombet, M.
    Soerjomataram, I.
    Mathers, C.
    Parkin, D. M.
    Pineros, M.
    Znaor, A.
    Bray, F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 144 (08) : 1941 - 1953
  • [8] GUPTA R, 2018, J CLIN ONCOL, V36, P18, DOI DOI 10.4103/IJMM.IJMM_18_50
  • [9] He D, 2015, INT J CLIN EXP MED, V8, P14693
  • [10] Hen X, 2011, ZHONGHUA BING LI XUE, V40, P173