Millisecond speed deep learning based proton dose calculation with Monte Carlo accuracy

被引:35
作者
Pastor-Serrano, Oscar [1 ]
Perko, Zoltan [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Radiat Sci & Technol, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
deep learning; dose calculation; online adaptation; proton therapy; Monte Carlo; pencil beam; NEURAL-NETWORKS; CANCER PATIENTS; THERAPY; DISTRIBUTIONS; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION; TRANSPORT; SYSTEM; ENGINE; IMPT;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ac692e
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Next generation online and real-time adaptive radiotherapy workflows require precise particle transport simulations in sub-second times, which is unfeasible with current analytical pencil beam algorithms (PBA) or Monte Carlo (MC) methods. We present a deep learning based millisecond speed dose calculation algorithm (DoTA) accurately predicting the dose deposited by mono-energetic proton pencil beams for arbitrary energies and patient geometries. Approach. Given the forward-scattering nature of protons, we frame 3D particle transport as modeling a sequence of 2D geometries in the beam's eye view. DoTA combines convolutional neural networks extracting spatial features (e.g. tissue and density contrasts) with a transformer self-attention backbone that routes information between the sequence of geometry slices and a vector representing the beam's energy, and is trained to predict low noise MC simulations of proton beamlets using 80 000 different head and neck, lung, and prostate geometries. Main results. Predicting beamlet doses in 5 +/- 4.9 ms with a very high gamma pass rate of 99.37 +/- 1.17% (1%, 3 mm) compared to the ground truth MC calculations, DoTA significantly improves upon analytical pencil beam algorithms both in precision and speed. Offering MC accuracy 100 times faster than PBAs for pencil beams, our model calculates full treatment plan doses in 10-15 s depending on the number of beamlets (800-2200 in our plans), achieving a 99.70 +/- 0.14% (2%, 2 mm) gamma pass rate across 9 test patients. Significance. Outperforming all previous analytical pencil beam and deep learning based approaches, DoTA represents a new state of the art in data-driven dose calculation and can directly compete with the speed of even commercial GPU MC approaches. Providing the sub-second speed required for adaptive treatments, straightforward implementations could offer similar benefits to other steps of the radiotherapy workflow or other modalities such as helium or carbon treatments.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Aerts H., 2015, Data From NSCLC-Radiomics-Genomics Cancer Imaging, DOI [10.7937/K9/TCIA.2015.L4FRET6Z, DOI 10.7937/K9/TCIA.2015.L4FRET6Z]
[2]   Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach [J].
Aerts, Hugo J. W. L. ;
Velazquez, Emmanuel Rios ;
Leijenaar, Ralph T. H. ;
Parmar, Chintan ;
Grossmann, Patrick ;
Cavalho, Sara ;
Bussink, Johan ;
Monshouwer, Rene ;
Haibe-Kains, Benjamin ;
Rietveld, Derek ;
Hoebers, Frank ;
Rietbergen, Michelle M. ;
Leemans, C. Rene ;
Dekker, Andre ;
Quackenbush, John ;
Gillies, Robert J. ;
Lambin, Philippe .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2014, 5
[3]   Online daily adaptive proton therapy [J].
Albertini, Francesca ;
Matter, Michael ;
Nenoff, Lena ;
Zhang, Ye ;
Lomax, Antony .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1107)
[4]  
Ba Jimmy Lei, 2016, LAYER NORMALIZATION, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.1607.06450
[5]   Deep dose plugin: towards real-time Monte Carlo dose calculation through a deep learning-based denoising algorithm [J].
Bai, Ti ;
Wang, Biling ;
Nguyen, Dan ;
Jiang, Steve .
MACHINE LEARNING-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 2 (02)
[6]   Three-dimensional dose prediction for lung IMRT patients with deep neural networks: robust learning from heterogeneous beam configurations [J].
Barragan-Montero, Ana Maria ;
Dan Nguyen ;
Lu, Weiguo ;
Lin, Mu-Han ;
Norouzi-Kandalan, Roya ;
Geets, Xavier ;
Sterpin, Edmond ;
Jiang, Steve .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (08) :3679-3691
[7]  
Brown TB., 2020, ADV NEURAL INF PROCE
[8]   A feasibility study on an automated method to generate patient-specific dose distributions for radiotherapy using deep learning [J].
Chen, Xinyuan ;
Men, Kuo ;
Li, Yexiong ;
Yi, Junlin ;
Dai, Jianrong .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (01) :56-64
[9]   The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository [J].
Clark, Kenneth ;
Vendt, Bruce ;
Smith, Kirk ;
Freymann, John ;
Kirby, Justin ;
Koppel, Paul ;
Moore, Stephen ;
Phillips, Stanley ;
Maffitt, David ;
Pringle, Michael ;
Tarbox, Lawrence ;
Prior, Fred .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2013, 26 (06) :1045-1057
[10]   A noise correction of the γ-index method for Monte Carlo dose distribution comparison [J].
Cohilis, Marie ;
Ste Rpin, Edmond ;
Lee, John A. ;
Souris, Kevin .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (02) :681-692