Indoor environmental quality differences between office types in LEED-certified buildings in the US

被引:62
|
作者
Lee, Young S. [1 ]
Guerin, Denise A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Sch Planning Design & Construct, E Lansing, MI 48823 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Coll Design, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
Indoor air quality; Thermal quality; Lighting quality; Occupant satisfaction and performance; Office types; LEED-certified buildings; SATISFACTION; WORKPLACE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.10.019
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The study compared IAQ, thermal quality, and lighting quality between 5 different office types in LEED-certified buildings in relation to employees' environmental satisfaction and their job performance. This was to provide workplaces where workers in each specific office environment could be provided with appropriate office settings regarding these IEQ criteria when organizations comply with LEED standards. The five types of office included private enclosed, private shared, open-plan with high cubicle over 5', open-plan with low cubicle lower than 5', and open-plan with no partitions (bullpen) offices. The study found IAQ enhanced workers' job performance in enclosed private offices more than both high cubicles and low cubicles. All four office types had higher satisfaction with the amount of light and visual comfort of light as well as more enhancement with job performance due to lighting quality than high cubicles. There was no difference in thermal quality between the five office types. IAQ and lighting quality were not different between enclosed private, enclosed shared, and bullpen office types, either. The study findings suggest a careful workplace design considering the height of partitions in LEED-certified buildings to improve employee's environmental satisfaction and job performance. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1104 / 1112
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How does indoor environmental quality in green refurbished office buildings compare with the one in new certified buildings?
    Lee, Jang-Young
    Wargocki, Pawel
    Chan, Yiong-Huak
    Chen, Liu
    Tham, Kwok-Wai
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 171
  • [22] Another look at "2019 energy benchmarking data for LEED-certified buildings in Washington"
    Scofield, John H.
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 45
  • [23] Another look at 2019 energy benchmarking data for LEED-certified buildings in Washington
    Scofield, John H.
    Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 45
  • [24] Energy performance of LEED-certified buildings from 2015 Chicago benchmarking data
    Scofield, John H.
    Doane, Jillian
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 174 : 402 - 413
  • [25] Energy Consumption Evaluation of U.S. Navy LEED-Certified Buildings
    Menassa, Carol
    Mangasarian, Seth
    El Asmar, Mounir
    Kirar, Carl
    JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2012, 26 (01) : 46 - 53
  • [26] Assessment of Energy Credits in LEED-Certified Buildings Based on Certification Levels and Project Ownership
    Gurgun, Asli Pelin
    Arditi, David
    BUILDINGS, 2018, 8 (02)
  • [27] Unravelling the relationship between energy and indoor environmental quality in Australian office buildings
    Roumi, Soheil
    Stewart, Rodney A.
    Zhang, Fan
    Santamouris, Mattheos
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2021, 227 : 190 - 202
  • [28] Influence of factors unrelated to environmental quality on occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings
    Schiavon, Stefano
    Altomonte, Sergio
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 77 : 148 - 159
  • [29] Analyzing the Perceived Benefits of LEED-Certified and Energy Star-Certified Buildings in the Realm of Local Economic Development
    Leland, Suzanne M.
    Read, Dustin C.
    Wittry, Michael
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2015, 29 (04) : 363 - 375
  • [30] Whole-building embodied carbon of a North American LEED-certified library: Sensitivity analysis of the environmental impact of buildings materials
    Meneghelli, Andrea
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 134 : 230 - 241