Gun laws and sudden death - Did the Australian firearms legislation of 1996 make a difference?

被引:43
作者
Baker, Jeanine
McPhedran, Samara
机构
[1] Sporting Shooters Assoc Australia, Res & Policy Unit, Gumeracha, SA 5233, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] WiSH, Ballarat, Vic 3353, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1093/bjc/azl084
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Mass murders in Dunblane, United Kingdom, and Port Arthur, Australia, provoked rapid responses from the governments of both countries. Major changes to Australian laws resulted in a controversial buy-back of longarms and tighter legislation. The Australian situation enables evaluation of the effect of a national buy-back, accompanied by tightened legislation in a country with relatively secure borders. AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) was used to predict future values of the time series for homicide, suicide and accidental death before and after the 1996 National Firearms Agreement (ATA). Men compared with observed values, firearm suicide was the only parameter the ATA may have influenced, although societal factors could also have influenced observed changes. The findings have profound implications for future firearm legislation policy direction.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 469
页数:15
相关论文
共 33 条