Evaluation of the green technology innovation efficiency of China's manufacturing industries: DEA window analysis with ideal window width

被引：103
作者：
Lin, Shoufu [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Ji [1 ]
Marinova, Dora [3 ]
Zhao, Dingtao [2 ]
机构：
[1] FuJian Normal Univ, Sch Econ, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Curtin Univ Technol, Curtin Univ Sustainabil Policy Inst, Perth, WA, Australia
来源：
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT | 2018年 / 30卷 / 10期
关键词：
DEA window analysis; absolute beta convergence; green technology innovation efficiency; manufacturing industry; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; POWER-PLANTS; ENERGY; SECTOR; PRODUCTIVITY; COUNTRIES; IMPACT; GROWTH; MODEL; SHIFT;
D O I：
10.1080/09537325.2018.1457784
中图分类号：
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号：
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要：
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) window analysis with ideal window width is applied to evaluate the green technology innovation efficiency of 28 manufacturing industries in China during 2006-2014. The obtained results are compared with those calculated using the traditional DEA model, and convergence analysis of the efficiency is conducted. Five years is the obtained ideal window width and DEA window analysis with ideal window produces results closer to reality for China's manufacturing industry. The overall efficiency of the green technology innovation in the manufacturing sector is low following a wave-shaped curve - first decreasing, then increasing and decreasing again, with large inter-industrial differences. There are 8 high-, 14 medium- and 6 low-efficiency industries. A convergence trend in the green technology innovation efficiency within the 28 manufacturing industries exists, implying a catch-up effect between them.
引用
收藏
页码：1166 / 1181
页数：16
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], REV NETW EC, DOI DOI 10.2202/1446-9022.1050
[2]   Combining DEA window analysis with the Malmquist index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry [J].
Asmild, M ;
Paradi, JC ;
Aggarwall, V ;
Schaffnit, C .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2004, 21 (01) :67-89
[3]   Efficiency and effectiveness between open and closed innovation: empirical evidence in South Korean manufacturers [J].
Bae, Youngim ;
Chang, Hyunjoon .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2012, 24 (10) :967-980
[4]  
Bai J.H., 2011, FINANCE TRADE EC, P104
[5]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[6]  
Charnes A., 1985, ANN OPER RES, V2, P59, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01874733, 10.1007/BF01874733]
[7]  
Chen H., 2013, SCI RES MANAGEMENT, V7, P101
[8]   Forecasting MBT technologies using DEA and LR [J].
Cho, Yonghee ;
Anderson, Timothy R. .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2017, 29 (04) :353-369
[9]   Impact of firm size and industry type on R&D efficiency throughout innovation and commercialisation stages: evidence from Korean manufacturing firms [J].
Chun, Dongphil ;
Chung, Yanghon ;
Bang, Sungsig .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2015, 27 (08) :895-909
[10]   You can't manage right what you can't measure well: Technological innovation efficiency [J].
Cruz-Cazares, Claudio ;
Bayona-Saez, Cristina ;
Garcia-Marco, Teresa .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (6-7) :1239-1250
1234567