Radiological scoring methods for ankylosing spondylitis: a comparison between the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index and the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score

被引:1
作者
Salaffi, F.
Carotti, M.
Garofalo, G.
Giuseppetti, G. M.
Grassi, W.
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Marche, Dept Rheumatol, Ancona, Italy
[2] Univ Politecn Marche, Dept Radiol, Ancona, Italy
关键词
ankylosing spondylitis; radiographic scoring methods; intra- and interobserver reliability; BASRI; mSASSS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective The main objective of the present study was to test the interobserver reliability, truth, discrimination and feasibility of two scoring methods available in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) over a follow-up period of 3 years. Methods Two blinded trained observers scored 95 AS radiographs from a cohort of AS patients. Each radiograph was scored by two scoring methods, the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS), and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index - spine (BASRI-spine). Interobserver agreement was analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The construct validity was assessed by examining the correlation of the scoring methods with measnres Qf spinal mobility (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metronomy Index - BASMI), functional limitation (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index - BASH) and disease duration. Bland and Altmans 95% limits of agreement method and effect size (ES) analysis were used to estimate the smallest detectable difference (SDD) of radiological progression and responsiveness. Results The BASRI-spine reached intra- and interobserver ICC of 0.755 and 0.831, respectively. The mSASSS scores were mort reliable, with ICC of 0.874 and 0.941, respectively. Both scoring systems correlated significantly with BASMI (p = 0.01), while only the mSASSS showed a siginficant correlation (p = 0.02) with BASH. With regards to sensitivity to change, it was found that mSASSS classified the highest percentage of patients with more changes than the BASRI-spine (mSASSS: 35.8% vs. BASRI-spine: 15.8%). The ES analysis also suggested that the mSASSS was more responsive than BASRI-spine. Concerning feasibility, the BASRI-spine takes less time for scoring. Conclusion We have shown that the mSASSS offers advantages in measurement properties and is the most appropriate method by which to assess progression of structural damage in AS.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 74
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], RADIOGRAPHIC SCORING
  • [2] Averns HL, 1996, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V35, P373
  • [3] COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982): : 1085 - 1087
  • [4] Boers M, 1998, J RHEUMATOL, V25, P198
  • [5] First update of the international ASAS consensus statement for the use of anti-TNF agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis
    Braun, J
    Davis, J
    Dougados, M
    Sieper, J
    van der Linden, S
    van der Heijde, D
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2006, 65 (03) : 316 - 320
  • [6] Radiologic diagnosis and pathology of the spondyloarthropathies
    Braun, J
    Bollow, M
    Sieper, J
    [J]. RHEUMATIC DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1998, 24 (04) : 697 - +
  • [7] Braun J, 1998, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V41, P58, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(199801)41:1<58::AID-ART8>3.3.CO
  • [8] 2-7
  • [9] Braun Juergen, 1996, Current Opinion in Rheumatology, V8, P275, DOI 10.1097/00002281-199607000-00003
  • [10] Brophy S, 2002, J RHEUMATOL, V29, P1236