Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: The DERS-16

被引:477
作者
Bjureberg, Johan [1 ]
Ljotsson, Brjann [1 ]
Tull, Matthew T. [2 ]
Hedman, Erik [1 ]
Sahlin, Hanna [1 ]
Lundh, Lars-Gunnar [3 ]
Bjarehed, Jonas [3 ]
DiLillo, David [4 ]
Messman-Moore, Terri [5 ]
Gumpert, Clara Hellner [1 ]
Gratz, Kim L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, Nobels Vag 9, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Human Behav, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Psychol, Lund, Sweden
[4] Univ Nebraska, Dept Psychol, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[5] Miami Univ, Dept Psychol, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
关键词
Emotion regulation; Short version; Self-report measure; Assessment; Experiential avoidance; DELIBERATE SELF-HARM; REGULATION GROUP-THERAPY; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; DIALECTICAL BEHAVIOR-THERAPY; RISKY SEXUAL-BEHAVIOR; ANXIETY SENSITIVITY; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; EXPERIENTIAL AVOIDANCE; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PERSONALITY-DISORDER;
D O I
10.1007/s10862-015-9514-x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is a widely-used, theoretically-driven, and psychometrically-sound self-report measure of emotion regulation difficulties. However, at 36-items, the DERS may be challenging to administer in some situations or settings (e.g., in the course of patient care or large-scale epidemiological studies). Consequently, there is a need for a briefer version of the DERS. The goal of the present studies was to develop and evaluate a 16-item version of the DERS - the DERS-16. The reliability and validity of the DERS-16 were examined in a clinical sample (N = 96) and two large community samples (Ns = 102 and 482). The validity of the DERS-16 was evaluated comparing the relative strength of the association of the two versions of the DERS with measures of emotion regulation and related constructs, psychopathology, and clinically-relevant behaviors theorized to stem from emotion regulation deficits. Results demonstrate that the DERS-16 has retained excellent internal consistency, good test-retest reliability, and good convergent and discriminant validity. Further, the DERS-16 showed minimal differences in its convergent and discriminant validity with relevant measures when compared to the original DERS. In conclusion, the DERS-16 offers a valid and brief method for the assessment of overall emotion regulation difficulties.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 296
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条