Trust and reciprocity with transparency and repeated interactions

被引:47
|
作者
Kanagaretnam, Kiridaran [1 ]
Mestelman, Stuart [2 ]
Nainar, S. M. Khalid [1 ,3 ]
Shehata, Mohamed [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, DeGroote Sch Business, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M4, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Econ, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M4, Canada
[3] Indian Sch Business, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
[4] Kuwait Univ, Coll Business Adm, Kuwait, Kuwait
关键词
Transparency; Trust; Reciprocity; Repeated interaction; Business alliances; SOX; COOPERATION; REPUTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper uses data from a controlled laboratory environment to Study the impact of transparency (i.e., complete information versus incomplete information) and repeated interactions oil the level of trust and trustworthiness (reciprocity) in air investment game setting. The key findings of the study are that transparency (complete information) significantly increases trusting behavior in one-shot interactions. This result persists in repeated interactions. Further, transparency appears important for trustworthiness in one-shot interactions. In addition, repeated interaction increases trust and reciprocity with or without transparency. These results Suggest that transparency is important in building trust in business environments Such as alliances and joint ventures which are loosely connected organizational forms that bring together otherwise independent firms. It also provides Support for the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) and similar legislation elsewhere which attempt to regain investors' trust in corporate management and financial markets by stipulating enhanced disclosures. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 247
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transparency rights, technology, and trust
    Elia, John
    ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 11 (02) : 145 - 153
  • [32] Transparency, Accountability, and Trust in Society
    Volkova, Olga
    VOPROSY EKONOMIKI, 2015, (02): : 141 - 148
  • [33] TRUST, RECIPROCITY, AND RULES
    Rietz, Thomas A.
    Schniter, Eric
    Sheremeta, Roman M.
    Shields, Timothy W.
    ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2018, 56 (03) : 1526 - 1542
  • [34] Computational Trust Model for Repeated Trust Games
    Dang, Quang-Vinh
    Ignat, Claudia-Lavinia
    2016 IEEE TRUSTCOM/BIGDATASE/ISPA, 2016, : 34 - 41
  • [35] Adolescents' trust and reciprocity toward friends, unknown peers, and community members
    Sweijen, Sophie W.
    te Brinke, Lysanne W.
    van de Groep, Suzanne
    Crone, Eveline A.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENCE, 2023, 33 (04) : 1422 - 1434
  • [36] Trust, positive reciprocity, and negative reciprocity: Do these traits impact entrepreneurial dynamics?
    Caliendo, Marco
    Fossen, Frank
    Kritikos, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 33 (02) : 394 - 409
  • [37] Socialisation, trust and reciprocity among young people
    Matteo Migheli
    Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 2012, 148 (1) : 77 - 95
  • [38] Trust, Reciprocity, and Guanxi in China: An Experimental Investigation
    Song, Fei
    Cadsby, C. Bram
    Bi, Yunyun
    MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION REVIEW, 2012, 8 (02) : 397 - 421
  • [39] Reciprocity and the Paradox of Trust in psychological game theory
    Isoni, Andrea
    Sugden, Robert
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2019, 167 : 219 - 227
  • [40] Transparency and trust in artificial intelligence systems
    Schmidt, Philipp
    Biessmann, Felix
    Teubner, Timm
    JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2020, 29 (04) : 260 - 278