Effectiveness of the world anti-doping agency's e-learning programme for anti-doping education on knowledge of, explicit and implicit attitudes towards, and likelihood of doping among Chinese college athletes and non-athletes

被引:11
|
作者
Deng, Zhangyan [1 ]
Guo, Jinyang [1 ]
Wang, Dong [2 ]
Huang, Tao [2 ]
Chen, Zuosong [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Educ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Phys Educ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Univ Phys Educt & Sports, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Anti-doping education; WADA; Evaluation; Implicit attitude; fNIRS; MORAL DISENGAGEMENT; DECISION-MAKING; BIOLOGY LESSONS; SUBSTANCE USE; INTERVENTION; PREVENTION; SPORTS;
D O I
10.1186/s13011-022-00459-1
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the World Anti-Doping Agency's e-learning programme for anti-doping education on knowledge of, explicit and implicit attitudes towards, and likelihood of doping among Chinese college athletes and non-athletes. Method Thirty-two young adults (including 16 college athletes) were recruited to receive the Athlete Learning Program about Health and Anti-Doping (ALPHA) intervention (Zh-hans version). Another 32 young adults were recruited for no-treatment control purposes. Before and immediately after the intervention, the ALPHA test, performance enhancement attitude scale, doping likelihood scale, and brief implicit association test (BIAT) were performed. Cortical activity during the BIAT test was monitored using a functional near-infrared spectroscopy instrument. Results Significant intervention effects were observed for knowledge (p < 0.01, eta(2) = 0.21) and explicit attitude (p < 0.05, eta(2) = 0.12) but not for doping likelihood (p > 0.05; benefit situation: eta(2) = 0.04; cost situation: eta(2) = 0.02). Compared with the non-athletes, the college athletes reported lower doping likelihood scores in benefit situations (e.g., financial gain, p < 0.05, eta(2) = 0.10). Regarding the BIAT task, the experimental effect was successfully induced by different semantic associations between the concepts and the attitude (doping + like vs. doping + dislike). The mean reaction times (p < 0.01, eta(2) = 0.36) and error rate (p < 0.01, eta(2) = 0.34) in the doping-like block were higher than those in the doping-dislike block. Moreover, oxygenated haemoglobin (oxy-Hb) in response to BIAT interference in the temporoparietal junction-related channels was increased during the post-intervention test (p < 0.05, eta(2) varied from 0.09 to 0.16). Conclusions The findings suggest that the online anti-doping education programme is partially effective among Chinese college athletes and non-athletes. Furthermore, our findings reflect enhanced cognitive control after the education intervention to suppress a prepotent implicit attitude towards doping.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of the world anti-doping agency's e-learning programme for anti-doping education on knowledge of, explicit and implicit attitudes towards, and likelihood of doping among Chinese college athletes and non-athletes
    Zhangyan Deng
    Jinyang Guo
    Dong Wang
    Tao Huang
    Zuosong Chen
    Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 17
  • [2] A national anti-doping education programme reduces doping susceptibility in British athletes
    Hurst, Philip
    King, Ailish
    Massey, Kelly
    Kavussanu, Maria
    Ring, Christopher
    PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE, 2023, 69
  • [3] Impact of anti-doping education and doping control experience on anti-doping knowledge in Japanese university athletes: a cross-sectional study
    Murofushi, Yuka
    Kawata, Yujiro
    Kamimura, Akari
    Hirosawa, Masataka
    Shibata, Nobuto
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PREVENTION AND POLICY, 2018, 13
  • [4] Impact of anti-doping education and doping control experience on anti-doping knowledge in Japanese university athletes: a cross-sectional study
    Yuka Murofushi
    Yujiro Kawata
    Akari Kamimura
    Masataka Hirosawa
    Nobuto Shibata
    Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 13
  • [5] True Dopers or Negligent Athletes? An Analysis of Anti-Doping Rule Violations Reported to the World Anti-Doping Agency 2010-2012
    de Hon, Olivier
    van Bottenburg, Maarten
    SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 2017, 52 (14) : 1932 - 1936
  • [6] Subjective and actual anti-doping knowledge among japanese university athletes
    Murofushi, Yuka
    Kamihigash, Etsuko
    Kawata, Yujiro
    Yamaguchi, Shinji
    Takazawa, Yuji
    Naito, Hisashi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT AND EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 19 : S425 - S426
  • [7] Rheumatological prescribing in athletes: a review of the new World Anti-Doping Agency guidelines
    Smith, R
    Barnsley, L
    Kannangara, S
    Mace, A
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2004, 43 (12) : 1473 - 1475
  • [8] Doping Prevalence among US Elite Athletes Subject to Drug Testing under the World Anti-Doping Code
    Davoren, Ann Kearns
    Rulison, Kelly
    Milroy, Jeff
    Grist, Pauline
    Fedoruk, Matthew
    Lewis, Laura
    Wyrick, David
    SPORTS MEDICINE-OPEN, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [9] The role of comprehensive education in anti-doping policy legitimacy and support among clean athletes
    Barkoukis, Vassilis
    Mallia, Luca
    Lazuras, Lambros
    Ourda, Despoina
    Agnello, Sara
    Andjelkovic, Marija
    Bochaver, Konstantin
    Folkers, Dirk
    Bondarev, Dmitriy
    Dikic, Nenad
    Dreiskaemper, Dennis
    Petroczi, Andrea
    Strauss, Bernd
    Zelli, Arnaldo
    PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE, 2022, 60
  • [10] Feasibility randomised controlled trial examining the effects of the Anti-Doping Values in Coach Education (ADVICE) mobile application on doping knowledge and attitudes towards doping among grassroots coaches
    Nicholls, Adam Robert
    Fairs, Lucas R. W.
    Plata-Andres, Mar
    Bailey, Richard
    Cope, Edward
    Madigan, Daniel
    Koenen, Katrin
    Glibo, Iva
    Theodorou, Nikolaos C.
    Laurent, Jean-Francois
    Garcia, Gaetan
    Chanal, Benoit
    BMJ OPEN SPORT & EXERCISE MEDICINE, 2020, 6 (01):