GLC_FCS30: global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30m using time-series Landsat imagery

被引:704
作者
Zhang, Xiao [1 ]
Liu, Liangyun [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xidong [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Yuan [1 ,3 ]
Xie, Shuai [1 ,2 ]
Mi, Jun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Remote Sensing, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Xian Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Geomat, Xian 710054, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
RANDOM FOREST; ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CLOUD SHADOW; AREA; PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHM; DATABASE; VERSION; URBAN;
D O I
10.5194/essd-13-2753-2021
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Over past decades, a lot of global land-cover products have been released; however, these still lack a global land-cover map with a fine classification system and spatial resolution simultaneously. In this study, a novel global 30m land-cover classification with a fine classification system for the year 2015 (GLC_FCS30-2015) was produced by combining time series of Landsat imagery and high-quality training data from the GSPECLib (Global Spatial Temporal Spectra Library) on the Google Earth Engine computing platform. First, the global training data from the GSPECLib were developed by applying a series of rigorous filters to the CCI_LC (Climate Change Initiative Global Land Cover) land-cover and MCD43A4 NBAR products (MODIS Nadir Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function-Adjusted Reflectance). Secondly, a local adaptive random forest model was built for each 5 degrees x 5 degrees geographical tile by using the multi-temporal Landsat spectral and texture features and the corresponding training data, and the GLC_FCS30-2015 land-cover product containing 30 land-cover types was generated for each tile. Lastly, the GLC_FCS30-2015 was validated using three different validation systems (containing different land-cover details) using 44 043 validation samples. The validation results indicated that the GLC_FCS30-2015 achieved an overall accuracy of 82.5% and a kappa coefficient of 0.784 for the level-0 validation system (9 basic land-cover types), an overall accuracy of 71.4% and kappa coefficient of 0.686 for the UN-LCCS (United Nations Land Cover Classification System) level1 system (16 LCCS land-cover types), and an overall accuracy of 68.7% and kappa coefficient of 0.662 for the UN-LCCS level-2 system (24 fine land-cover types). The comparisons against other land-cover products (CCI_LC, MCD12Q1, FROM_GLC, and GlobeLand30) indicated that GLC_FCS30-2015 provides more spatial details than CCI_LC-2015 and MCD12Q1-2015 and a greater diversity of land-cover types than FROM_GLC-2015 and GlobeLand30-2010. They also showed that GLC_FCS30-2015 achieved the best overall accuracy of 82.5% against FROM_GLC-2015 of 59.1% and GlobeLand30-2010 of 75.9 %. Therefore, it is concluded that the GLC_FCS30-2015 product is the first global land-cover dataset that provides a fine classification system (containing 16 global LCCS land-cover types as well as 14 detailed and regional land-cover types) with high classification accuracy at 30 m. The GLC_FCS30-2015 global land-cover products produced in this paper are free access at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3986872 (Liu et al., 2020).
引用
收藏
页码:2753 / 2776
页数:24
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [41] Liu LY, 2017, INT GEOSCI REMOTE SE, P4282, DOI 10.1109/IGARSS.2017.8127948
  • [42] Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data
    Loveland, TR
    Reed, BC
    Brown, JF
    Ohlen, DO
    Zhu, Z
    Yang, L
    Merchant, JW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2000, 21 (6-7) : 1303 - 1330
  • [43] A highly automated algorithm for wetland detection using multi-temporal optical satellite data
    Ludwig, Christina
    Walli, Andreas
    Schleicher, Christian
    Weichselbaum, Juergen
    Riffler, Michael
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 224 : 333 - 351
  • [44] Integrating cloud-based workflows in continental-scale cropland extent classification
    Massey, Richard
    Sankey, Temuulen T.
    Yadav, Kamini
    Congalton, Russell G.
    Tilton, James C.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 219 : 162 - 179
  • [45] Exploring issues of training data imbalance and mislabelling on random forest performance for large area land cover classification using the ensemble margin
    Mellor, Andrew
    Boukir, Samia
    Haywood, Andrew
    Jones, Simon
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 105 : 155 - 168
  • [46] Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR)
    Miller, Jay D.
    Thode, Andrea E.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 109 (01) : 66 - 80
  • [47] Mishra VN, 2015, 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MICROWAVE, OPTICAL AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING (ICMOCE), P208, DOI 10.1109/ICMOCE.2015.7489727
  • [48] Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change
    Olofsson, Pontus
    Foody, Giles M.
    Herold, Martin
    Stehman, Stephen V.
    Woodcock, Curtis E.
    Wulder, Michael A.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 148 : 42 - 57
  • [49] Making better use of accuracy data in land change studies: Estimating accuracy and area and quantifying uncertainty using stratified estimation
    Olofsson, Pontus
    Foody, Giles M.
    Stehman, Stephen V.
    Woodcock, Curtis E.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 129 : 122 - 131
  • [50] Effect of Training Class Label Noise on Classification Performances for Land Cover Mapping with Satellite Image Time Series
    Pelletier, Charlotte
    Valero, Silvia
    Inglada, Jordi
    Champion, Nicolas
    Sicre, Claire Marais
    Dedieu, Gerard
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (02)