How motivational orientations are related to ambidexterity

被引:11
作者
Caniels, Marjolein C. J. [1 ]
van Assen, Marcel F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ Netherlands, Dept Management Sci & Technol, Heerlen, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, TIAS, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
Ambidexterity; Regulatory focus; Assessment orientation; Locomotion orientation; REGULATORY FOCUS THEORY; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; PERFORMANCE; EXPLOITATION; EXPLORATION; LOCOMOTION; SERVICE; CONSEQUENCES; ANTECEDENTS; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1108/K-10-2018-0584
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose Whereas many studies address ambidexterity at the organizational level, much less is known about individual level ambidexterity. Moreover, there is a lack of thorough understanding of how motivational orientations are related to individual level ambidexterity. Yet, it is crucial to have an understanding of what motivates employees who perform explorative and exploitative activities. This study aims to empirically test the link between the constellation of motivational orientations of employees and their ambidexterity. Design/methodology/approach The authors use polynomial regression analysis and surface response analysis to analyze data from 103 employees employed in one Dutch organization. Polynomial regressions allow for analyzing linear and nonlinear direct and interactive effects between different motivational orientations in relation to individual level ambidexterity. Findings For individual ambidexterity, it is important to have an assessment orientation that is balanced with a locomotion orientation. Alternatively, people high on only locomotion orientation or only assessment orientation are also ambidextrous. Originality/value Insights into the motivational orientation of employees in relation to ambidexterity help to advance the theoretical understanding of how employees may enhance their individual ambidexterity.
引用
收藏
页码:2177 / 2189
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: Value transfer from "how" to "what"
    Avnet, T
    Higgins, ET
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 39 (05) : 525 - 530
  • [2] Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited
    Benner, MJ
    Tushman, ML
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (02) : 238 - 256
  • [3] A Dialectic Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands, Multiple Pathways, and Ambidexterity
    Bledow, Ronald
    Frese, Michael
    Anderson, Neil
    Erez, Miriam
    Farr, James
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2009, 2 (03): : 305 - 337
  • [4] Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process
    Brockner, J
    Higgins, ET
    Low, MB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2004, 19 (02) : 203 - 220
  • [5] Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work
    Brockner, J
    Higgins, ET
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2001, 86 (01) : 35 - 66
  • [6] Caniels M.C., 2018, CAREER DEV INT
  • [7] Employee ambidexterity, high performance work systems and innovative work behaviour: How much balance do we need?
    Caniels, Marjolein C. J.
    Veld, Monique
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 30 (04) : 565 - 585
  • [8] Ambidexterity of employees: the role of empowerment and knowledge sharing
    Caniels, Marjolein C. J.
    Neghina, Carmen
    Schaetsaert, Nico
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 21 (05) : 1098 - 1119
  • [9] Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects
    Cao, Qing
    Gedajlovic, Eric
    Zhang, Hongping
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) : 781 - 796
  • [10] The Microfoundations Movement in Strategy and Organization Theory
    Felin, Teppo
    Foss, Nicolai J.
    Ployhart, Robert E.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2015, 9 (01) : 575 - 632