Use of Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Kim, Tae-Hun [1 ,2 ]
Kang, Jung Won [3 ]
Jeon, Sae-Rom [2 ]
Ang, Lin [4 ,5 ]
Lee, Hye Won [6 ]
Lee, Myeong Soo [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Korean Med Hosp, Korean Med Clin Trial Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch, Dept ofClin Korean Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ, Coll Korean Med, Dept Acupuncture & Moxibust, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Korea Inst Oriental Med, KM Sci Res Div, Daejeon, South Korea
[5] Univ Sci & Technol, Korean Convergence Med, Daejeon, South Korea
[6] Korea Inst Oriental Med, KM Convergence Res Div, Daejeon, South Korea
关键词
prevalence of usage; complementary and alternative medicine; systematic review; meta-analysis; STROBE statement; Traditional Complementary and Integrative Medicine; TCIM; DISEASE; 2019; COVID-19; CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS; ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; ASSOCIATION; KNOWLEDGE; PROVINCE; CARE;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2022.884573
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine (TCIM) has been reported to use for symptom management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The objective of this review was to identify the overall usage prevalence of TCIM interventions for COVID-19. Methods: Surveys on the general population and observational studies on the COVID-19 patient chart review were located in the search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases in September 2021. Observational studies, such as cross-sectional studies, surveys, cohort studies and hospital-based patient case reviews, published in any language, reporting the usage of TCIM in the patients with COVID-19 or the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic were included in this review. Data screening and extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. The reporting quality of the included studies was assessed with the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. To conduct a meta-analysis of the usage prevalence of various TCIM interventions, the effect size of the proportion for each intervention was calculated with the inverse variance method. The main outcome was usage prevalence of TCIM interventions among patients with COVID-19 or the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: A total of 62 studies were included in this review. The overall TCIM usage prevalence was estimated to be 0.64 (95% CI 0.54-0.73). The overall prevalence did not differ between the population-based survey (0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.81) and the hospital-based patient case review (0.63, 95% CI 0.52-0.73). Statistical heterogeneity and comparatively low quality in reporting were observed, which should be cautiously considered when interpreting the results. Conclusion: Various TCIM interventions were reported to be used with comparatively high frequency. Future international collaborative research might overcome the main limitation of this study, i.e., the heterogeneity of the included data.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Access and use of general and mental health services before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sculco, Camilla
    Bano, Beatrice
    Prina, Eleonora
    Tedeschi, Federico
    Bartucz, Monica Bianca
    Barbui, Corrado
    Purgato, Marianna
    Albanese, Emiliano
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (03):
  • [22] Adaptations in the role of pharmacists under the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kambayashi, Dan
    Manabe, Toshie
    Hirohara, Masayoshi
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [23] Clinical Features of COVID-19 Patients in the First Year of Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Al Maqbali, Mohammed
    Al Badi, Khalid
    Al Sinani, Mohammed
    Madkhali, Norah
    Dickens, Geoffrey L.
    BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH FOR NURSING, 2022, 24 (02) : 172 - 185
  • [24] COVID-19 and healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gholami, Mandana
    Fawad, Iman
    Shadan, Sidra
    Rowaiee, Rashed
    Ghanem, HedaietAllah
    Khamis, Amar Hassan
    Ho, Samuel B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 104 : 335 - 346
  • [25] Efficacy of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for Treating COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs
    Yin, Bei
    Bi, Yi-Ming
    Sun, Lu
    Huang, Jin-Zhu
    Zhao, Jia
    Yao, Jia
    Li, An-Xiang
    Wang, Xian-Zhe
    Fan, Guan-Jie
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [26] Efficacy and Safety of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Heping
    Xu, Bowen
    Zhang, Ying
    Duan, Yuanyuan
    Gao, Ruike
    He, Haoqiang
    Li, Xiuyang
    Li, Jie
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [27] Prevalence of dry eye during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ji, Haiyang
    Yang, Yun
    Lu, Yunqiong
    Kong, Xiehe
    Yang, Guang
    Liu, Jie
    Yang, Yanting
    Wang, Xuejun
    Ma, Xiaopeng
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (12):
  • [28] Changes in appendicitis treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic - A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Koehler, Franziska
    Mueller, Sophie
    Hendricks, Anne
    Kastner, Carolin
    Reese, Lena
    Boerner, Kevin
    Flemming, Sven
    Lock, Johan F.
    Germer, Christoph-Thomas
    Wiegering, Armin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 95
  • [29] Decrease of cancer diagnosis during COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Angelini, Marco
    Teglia, Federica
    Astolfi, Laura
    Casolari, Giulia
    Boffetta, Paolo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 38 (1) : 31 - 38
  • [30] Gastrointestinal involvement in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rokkas, Theodore
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 33 (04): : 355 - 365