Cyclosporine minimization and cost reduction in renal transplant recipients receiving a C2-monitored, cyclosporine-based quadruple immunosuppressive regimen

被引:12
作者
Hardinger, KL
Schnitzler, MA
Koch, MJ
Enkvetchakul, D
Desai, N
Jendrisak, M
Lowell, JA
Miller, B
Shenoy, S
Brennan, DC
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Barnes Jewish Hosp, Dept Pharm, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Barnes Jewish Hosp, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Barnes Jewish Hosp, Hosp Adm Program, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Washington Univ, Barnes Jewish Hosp, Dept Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
cyclosporine; drug monitoring; outcomes; thymoglobulin;
D O I
10.1097/01.TP.0000137423.01887.7D
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Targeting 2-hr postdose cyclosporine (Q) levels to 1,000 to 1,700 mg/dL during the first 6 months after renal transplantation is recommended for triple immunosuppressive regimens. This trial determines whether lower C2 levels could be targeted safely in de novo kidney transplant recipients under a quadruple regimen compared with a similar cohort monitored with trough (C0) levels. Methods. This single-center, sequential, cohort-designed trial included patients who received Thymoglobulin, corticosteroids, an antimetabolite, and cyclosporine monitored by C2 (n=50) or C0 (n=50). Cyclosporine was tapered to maintain the C2 between 1,000 and 1,200 ng/mL months 0 to 3 and between 600 and 1,000 ng/mL thereafter and C0 between 250 and 350 ng/mL months 0 to 3 and between 100 and 250 ng/mL thereafter. Results. Baseline patient and donor characteristics were similar. There were no differences in graft survival (100% C2 vs. 100% C0), acute rejection (4% C2 vs. 6% C0), allograft function, or adverse events at 6 months. C2 levels were lower than the suggested guidelines throughout the study (33% lower at 1 month and 48% lower at 6 months). Lower cyclosporine doses were achieved in the C2 arm compared with the C0 arm by 1 month and were sustained throughout the trial, which translated into an average cyclosporine cost savings of $773 in the C2 arm during the 6-month period (P<0.001). Conclusion. With a quadruple immunosuppressive regimen and lower C2 targets than recommended for triple therapy, safe and effective cyclosporine minimization was achieved. Lower cyclosporine doses were achieved in C2-monitored patients compared with C0-monitored patients, translating into lower immunosuppressive costs.
引用
收藏
页码:1198 / 1203
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Comparison of neoral dose monitoring with cyclosporine trough levels versus 2-hr postdose levels in stable liver transplant patients [J].
Cantarovich, M ;
Barkun, JS ;
Tchervenkov, JI ;
Besner, JG ;
Aspeslet, L ;
Metrakos, P .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (12) :1621-1627
[2]  
Cantarovich M, 1998, CLIN TRANSPLANT, V12, P243
[3]   C2 single-point sampling to evaluate cyclosporine exposure in long-term renal transplant recipients [J].
Citterio, F ;
Scatà, MC ;
Borzi, MT ;
Pozzetto, U ;
Castagneto, M .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (7-8) :3133-3136
[4]   Clinical benefits of neoral C2 monitoring in the long-term management of renal transplant recipients [J].
Cole, E ;
Naham, N ;
Cardella, C ;
Cattran, D ;
Fenton, S ;
Hamel, J ;
O'Grady, C ;
Smith, R .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (12) :2086-2090
[5]   Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Final Report [J].
Grundy, SM ;
Becker, D ;
Clark, LT ;
Cooper, RS ;
Denke, MA ;
Howard, WJ ;
Hunninghake, DB ;
Illingworth, R ;
Luepker, RV ;
McBride, P ;
McKenney, JM ;
Pasternak, RC ;
Stone, NJ ;
Van Horn, L ;
Brewer, HB ;
Cleeman, JI ;
Ernst, ND ;
Gordon, D ;
Levy, D ;
Rifkind, B ;
Rossouw, JE ;
Savage, P ;
Haffner, SM ;
Orloff, DG ;
Proschan, MA ;
Schwartz, JS ;
Sempos, CT ;
Shero, ST ;
Murray, EZ ;
Keller, SA ;
Jehle, AJ .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (25) :3143-3421
[6]  
Keown P, 2001, TRANSPLANTATION, V72, P1024
[7]   Patient management by Neoral C2 monitoring:: An international Consensus statement [J].
Levy, G ;
Thervet, E ;
Lake, J ;
Uchida, K .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 73 (09) :S12-S18
[8]   Improved clinical outcomes for liver transplant recipients using cyclosporine monitoring based on 2-hr post-dose levels (C2) [J].
Levy, G ;
Burra, P ;
Cavallari, A ;
Duvoux, C ;
Lake, J ;
Mayer, AD ;
Mies, S ;
Pollard, SG ;
Varo, E ;
Villamil, F ;
Johnston, A .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 73 (06) :953-959
[9]  
Mahalati K, 2001, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V12, P828, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V124828
[10]  
MURRAY L, 2003, 2003 DRUG TOPICS RED