A fast reaction-based port vulnerability assessment: Case of Tianjin Port explosion

被引:38
作者
Cao, Xinhu [1 ]
Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Inst Catastrophe Risk Management, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
关键词
Fast reaction-based port vulnerability assessment (FRPVA); Catastrophe; Tianjin Port explosion; Fuzzy evidential reasoning; TOPSIS; Quantitative analysis; RISK-ASSESSMENT; DECISION-ANALYSIS; SAFETY ANALYSIS; TOPSIS METHODS; FAILURE MODE; FUZZY; ROBUSTNESS; RESILIENCE; DISRUPTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2019.05.019
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
There has been a growing international attention on port catastrophes after the 2015 Tianjin Port explosion, which calls for a realistic yet effective method to assess seaports' vulnerability. However, quantitative vulnerability analysis of ports during the initial post-disaster stage by traditional methods reveals challenges due to the scarcity of data and the inoperability in treating diverse data formations in a utility vulnerability inference mechanism. Thus, this study proposes a fast reaction-based port vulnerability assessment framework (FRPVA) which allows the quantification of ex-post port vulnerability. The fuzzy evidential reasoning (ER) approach and the fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are embedded in the proposed framework. The FRPVA framework is applied to the case of the 2015 Tianjin Port explosion in two assessment periods - one day and four months after the explosion. Our results show that (1) the collection and distribution system as well as the storage system are bottlenecks of the Tianjin Port; (2) the storage system is the most vulnerable among the four assessment units in both assessment periods; (3) after four months' recovery, the vulnerability condition of the loading and unloading system improves the most comparing to other three assessment units. Outputs of this framework can be useful references for various port stakeholders in prioritizing protected targets, planning routes, as well as for (re)insurance companies as a part of the catastrophe modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 33
页数:23
相关论文
共 56 条
[21]   Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment [J].
Dagdeviren, Metin ;
Yavuz, Serkan ;
Kilinc, Nevzat .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) :8143-8151
[22]   Historical analysis of accidents in seaports [J].
Darbra, RM ;
Casal, J .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2004, 42 (02) :85-98
[23]   Robustness, adaptation and innovation: Forest communities in the wake of Hurricane Dean [J].
DiGiano, Maria L. ;
Racelis, Alex E. .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 33 (01) :151-158
[24]  
Dragovic B., 2016, FLEXIBLE SERV MANUF, P1
[25]   Contagion in the Transpacific Shipping Network: International Networks and Vulnerability Interdependence [J].
Earnest, David C. ;
Yetiv, Steve ;
Carmel, Stephen M. .
INTERNATIONAL INTERACTIONS, 2012, 38 (05) :571-596
[26]   Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection [J].
Ertugrul, Irfan ;
Karakasoglu, Nilsen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 39 (7-8) :783-795
[27]   Spatiotemporal dynamics: the need for an innovative approach in mountain hazard risk management [J].
Fuchs, Sven ;
Keiler, Margreth ;
Sokratov, Sergey ;
Shnyparkov, Alexander .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2013, 68 (03) :1217-1241
[28]   Introduction of the human factor in the estimation of accident frequencies through fuzzy logic [J].
Gonzalez Dan, J. R. ;
Arnaldos, Josep ;
Darbra, R. M. .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2017, 97 :134-143
[29]   Analysis of multi-mitigation scenarios on maritime disruptions [J].
Gurning, Saut ;
Cahoon, Stephen .
MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2011, 38 (03) :251-268
[30]   Port vulnerability assessment from the perspective of critical infrastructure interdependency [J].
Hsieh, Cheng-Hsien ;
Tai, Hui-Huang ;
Lee, Yang-Ning .
MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2014, 41 (06) :589-606