A fast reaction-based port vulnerability assessment: Case of Tianjin Port explosion

被引:36
作者
Cao, Xinhu [1 ]
Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Inst Catastrophe Risk Management, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
关键词
Fast reaction-based port vulnerability assessment (FRPVA); Catastrophe; Tianjin Port explosion; Fuzzy evidential reasoning; TOPSIS; Quantitative analysis; RISK-ASSESSMENT; DECISION-ANALYSIS; SAFETY ANALYSIS; TOPSIS METHODS; FAILURE MODE; FUZZY; ROBUSTNESS; RESILIENCE; DISRUPTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2019.05.019
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
There has been a growing international attention on port catastrophes after the 2015 Tianjin Port explosion, which calls for a realistic yet effective method to assess seaports' vulnerability. However, quantitative vulnerability analysis of ports during the initial post-disaster stage by traditional methods reveals challenges due to the scarcity of data and the inoperability in treating diverse data formations in a utility vulnerability inference mechanism. Thus, this study proposes a fast reaction-based port vulnerability assessment framework (FRPVA) which allows the quantification of ex-post port vulnerability. The fuzzy evidential reasoning (ER) approach and the fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are embedded in the proposed framework. The FRPVA framework is applied to the case of the 2015 Tianjin Port explosion in two assessment periods - one day and four months after the explosion. Our results show that (1) the collection and distribution system as well as the storage system are bottlenecks of the Tianjin Port; (2) the storage system is the most vulnerable among the four assessment units in both assessment periods; (3) after four months' recovery, the vulnerability condition of the loading and unloading system improves the most comparing to other three assessment units. Outputs of this framework can be useful references for various port stakeholders in prioritizing protected targets, planning routes, as well as for (re)insurance companies as a part of the catastrophe modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 33
页数:23
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Vulnerability [J].
Adger, W. Neil .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03) :268-281
[2]  
[Anonymous], LLOYDS LIST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, MIN PROC EXT MET REV, DOI DOI 10.1080/08827508.2019.1575214
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, RES TRANSP ECON, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.RETREC.2011.11.005
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, BEIJING YOUTH DAILY
[6]   On Some Recent Definitions and Analysis Frameworks for Risk, Vulnerability, and Resilience [J].
Aven, Terje .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2011, 31 (04) :515-522
[7]  
Banks E., 2005, Catastrophic Risk: Analysis and Management
[8]   A survey of approaches for assessing and managing the risk of extremes [J].
Bier, VM ;
Haimes, YY ;
Lambert, JH ;
Matalas, NC ;
Zimmerman, R .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1999, 19 (01) :83-94
[9]   FUZZY-LOGIC PRIORITIZATION OF FAILURES IN A SYSTEM FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS [J].
BOWLES, JB ;
PELAEZ, CE .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1995, 50 (02) :203-213
[10]  
Brooks N., 2003, TYNDALL CTR CLIM CHA, V38, P1, DOI DOI 10.1086/379713