A New Way for Antihelixplasty in Prominent Ear Surgery: Modified Postauricular Fascial Flap

被引:6
作者
Tas, Suleyman [1 ]
Benlier, Erol [1 ]
机构
[1] Trakya Univ, Fac Med, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Balkan Campus, TR-22030 Edirne, Turkey
关键词
antihelix; flap; otoplasty; prominent ear; OTOPLASTY; ANATOMY;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000000309
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Otoplasty procedures aim to reduce the concha-mastoid angle and recreate the antihelical fold. Here, we explained the modified postauricular fascial flap, described as a new way for recreating the antihelical fold, and reported the results of patients on whom this flap was used. Materials and Methods The defined technique was used on 24 patients (10 females and 14 males; age, 6-27 years; mean, 16.7 years) between June 2009 and July 2012, a total of 48 procedures in total (bilateral). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 3 years (mean, 1.5 years). At the preoperative and postoperative time points (1 and 12 months after surgery), all patients were measured for upper and middle helix-head distance and were photographed. The records were analyzed statistically using t test and analysis of variance. Results The procedure resulted in ears that were natural in appearance without any significant visible evidence of surgery. The operations resulted in no complications except 1 patient who developed a small skin ulcer on the left ear because of band pressure. When we compared the preoperative and postoperative upper and middle helix-head distance, there was a high significance statistically. Conclusions To introduce modified postauricular fascial flap, we used a simple and safe procedure to recreate an antihelical fold. This procedure led to several benefits, including a natural-in-appearance antihelical fold, prevention of suture extrusion and granuloma, as well as minimized risk for recurrence due to neochondrogenesis. This method may be used as a standard procedure for treating prominent ears surgically.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 621
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Adamson J E, 1965, Plast Reconstr Surg, V36, P466, DOI 10.1097/00006534-196510000-00008
[2]  
BECKER OJ, 1949, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V50, P541
[3]   Effects of different suture materials on cartilage reshaping [J].
Cagici, Can Alper ;
Cakmak, Ozcan ;
Bal, Nebil ;
Yavuz, Haluk ;
Tuncer, Ilhan .
ARCHIVES OF FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2008, 10 (02) :124-129
[4]  
CHONGCHET V, 1963, Br J Plast Surg, V16, P268, DOI 10.1016/S0007-1226(63)80120-4
[5]  
CONVERSE J M, 1963, Plast Reconstr Surg, V31, P118, DOI 10.1097/00006534-196302000-00002
[6]   ANOTHER SOLUTION FOR PROBLEM OF PROMINENT EAR [J].
CRIKELAIR, GF ;
COSMAN, B .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1964, 160 (02) :314-&
[7]   The Use of a Retroauricular Fascioperichondrial Flap in the Recreation of the Antihelical Fold in Prominent Ear Surgery [J].
Frascino, Luiz Fernando .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2009, 63 (05) :536-540
[8]   Otoplasty for prominent ears [J].
Furnas, DW .
CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2002, 29 (02) :273-+
[9]   The postauricular fascial flap as an adjunct to Mustarde and Furnas type otoplasty [J].
Horlock, N ;
Misra, A ;
Gault, DT .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 108 (06) :1487-1490
[10]   Comparison of cartilage scoring and cartilage sparing otoplasty - A study of 203 cases [J].
Mandal, A. ;
Bahia, H. ;
Ahmad, T. ;
Stewart, K. J. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2006, 59 (11) :1170-1176