Validation of COSMIC values of foF2 and M(3000)F2 using ground-based ionosondes

被引:31
作者
McNamara, Leo F. [1 ]
Thompson, Donald C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Air Force Res Lab, AFRL RVBXI, Kirtland AFB, NM 87117 USA
关键词
Ionosphere; Validation; COSMIC radio occultation; Electron density profile; Vertical incidence ionosonde;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2014.07.015
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The COSMIC radio occultation values of the ionospheric F2 region peak parameters are a potential source of ground-truth data for validation of global ionospheric models. They should therefore be validated against reliable ground-truth observations such as manually scaled ionograms from ground-based vertical incidence (VI) ionosondes. We have therefore used the manually scaled hourly ionospheric characteristics from the Australian ionosonde network for this purpose. A comparison of the COSMIC F2 peak density, NmF2, against the values of the maximum plasma frequency, foF2, scaled from the Australian ionosondes showed very good agreement, with an RMS error in foF2 at mid latitudes of similar to 0.5 MHz. The ionograms from the Australian ionosondes are manually processed so the plasma frequency profile and the value of hmF2, the altitude corresponding to foF2, are not routinely provided. However, the ionograms do provide observations of M(3000)F2, the obliquity factor for a 3000 km communications circuit, which is well correlated with hmF2. We have therefore compared observed and COSMIC values of M(3000)F2. The latter are derived from numerical ionograms calculated for the COSMIC profiles. Because of the known uncertainties in the COSMIC profiles, we have applied some stringent acceptance procedures to them, especially for the M(3000)F2 analysis. These acceptance procedures are all automated, reducing the possibility of biased data selection. Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of COSPAR.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 169
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   The COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 Mission: Early Results [J].
Anthes, R. A. ;
Bernhardt, P. A. ;
Chen, Y. ;
Cucurull, L. ;
Dymond, K. F. ;
Ector, D. ;
Healy, S. B. ;
Ho, S. -P. ;
Hunt, D. C. ;
Kuo, Y. -H. ;
Liu, H. ;
Manning, K. ;
Mccormick, C. ;
Meehan, T. K. ;
Randel, W. J. ;
Rocken, C. ;
Schreiner, W. S. ;
Sokolovskiy, S. V. ;
Syndergaard, S. ;
Thompson, D. C. ;
Trenberth, K. E. ;
Wee, T. -K. ;
Yen, N. L. ;
Zeng, Z. .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 89 (03) :313-333
[2]   The international reference ionosphere today and in the future [J].
Bilitza, Dieter ;
McKinnell, Lee-Anne ;
Reinisch, Bodo ;
Fuller-Rowell, Tim .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2011, 85 (12) :909-920
[3]   Comparison between bottomside ionospheric profile parameters retrieved from FORMOSAT3 measurements and ground-based observations collected at Jicamarca [J].
Chuo, Yu-Jung ;
Lee, Chien-Chih ;
Chen, Wei-Sheng ;
Reinisch, Bodo W. .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2011, 73 (13) :1665-1673
[4]  
Cooke DL, 2003, FIRST CHAMP MISSION RESULTS FOR GRAVITY, MAGNETIC AND ATMOSPHERIC STUDIES, P212
[5]  
DAVIES K., 1990, WOMEN TIME WEAVING S
[6]   TOPEX/POSEIDON MISSION OVERVIEW [J].
FU, LL ;
CHRISTENSEN, EJ ;
YAMARONE, CA ;
LEFEBVRE, M ;
MENARD, Y ;
DORRER, M ;
ESCUDIER, P .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1994, 99 (C12) :24369-24381
[7]   Sounding of the topside ionosphere/plasmasphere based on GPS measurements from CHAMP:: Initial results -: art. no. 1699 [J].
Heise, S ;
Jakowski, N ;
Wehrenpfennig, A ;
Reigber, C ;
Lühr, H .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2002, 29 (14)
[8]  
Jakowski N, 2004, ANN GEOPHYS-ITALY, V47, P1049
[9]   Comparison of COSMIC occultation-based electron density profiles and TIP observations with Arecibo incoherent scatter radar data [J].
Kelley, M. C. ;
Wong, V. K. ;
Aponte, Nestor ;
Coker, Clayton ;
Mannucci, A. J. ;
Komjathy, A. .
RADIO SCIENCE, 2009, 44
[10]  
Krankowski Andrzej, 2011, J GEOD