Influence of interpregnancy interval on uterine rupture

被引:7
|
作者
Cunningham, Sarah [1 ]
Algeo, C. E. [1 ]
DeFranco, E. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Sci Bldg,Room 4407,231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
来源
关键词
Birth spacing; interpregnancy interval; uterine rupture; INTERDELIVERY INTERVAL; VAGINAL BIRTH; OUTCOMES; ASSOCIATION; LABOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2019.1671343
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aims to assess the independent influence of interpregnancy interval (IPI) on uterine rupture using a population-based cohort of all Ohio births, regardless of prior cesarean (PCS) or trial of labor (TOL) status. Study design: Population-based retrospective cohort study of all live births in Ohio (2006?2012). Frequency of uterine rupture was quantified and stratified by number of prior cesarean deliveries and IPI. The relative and adjusted risk of IPI on uterine rupture was calculated using multivariate logistic regression. Results: Of 1,034,522 live births recorded during the 7-year study period, 249 cases of uterine rupture were identified for analysis. Two-thirds of uterine rupture cases (n?=?158) occurred in women with one or more PCS and one-third (n?=?91) had no prior cesarean. IPI 24?59?months had the lowest frequency of uterine rupture and was used as the referent group. IPI 12?23 and IPI ? 60?months were not significantly associated with risk of uterine rupture, p?=?.847, .540 respectively. In women with PCS, IPI?<?12?months was associated with greater than two-fold increased risk of uterine rupture (aRR 2.4, CI 1.5?3.8). No association between IPI?<?12 months and uterine rupture was observed in women with no PCS, p?=?.696. Conclusion: IPI?<?12?months is independently associated with uterine rupture in women with prior cesarean, but does not appear to influence risk in women with an unscarred uterus.
引用
收藏
页码:2848 / 2853
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interpregnancy interval and severe maternal morbidity
    Garg, Bharti
    Pilliod, Rachel A.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S83 - S84
  • [32] Short Interpregnancy Interval and Obstetric Outcome
    Holloman, Conisha
    Guzman, Angela
    Carlan, Steve
    Eason, Ron
    Mcwhorter, Jeannie
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 : 36S - 36S
  • [33] Short interpregnancy interval: circumstance or choice?
    Taylor, Rebecca Alexandra Margaret
    Yang, Jenny M.
    Cheney, Kate
    Black, Kirsten
    BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2022, 48 (02) : 110 - 116
  • [34] Prenatal Patient Knowledge of the Interpregnancy Interval
    Bergin, Ashlee
    Rankin, Kristin
    Stumbras, Katrina
    Handler, Arden
    Haider, Sadia
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 : 18S - 18S
  • [36] Interpregnancy interval and abnormally invasive placentation
    Martimucci, Kristina
    Bilinski, Robyn
    Perez, Anisha M.
    Kuhn, Theresa
    Al-Khan, Abdulla
    Alvarez-Perez, Jesus R.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (02) : 183 - 187
  • [37] Long interpregnancy interval and mode of delivery
    Uzma Ishaque
    Diane Korb
    Adèle Poincare
    Thomas Schmitz
    Cécile Morin
    Olivier Sibony
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2019, 300 : 1621 - 1631
  • [38] INTERPREGNANCY INTERVAL AND RISK OF PRETERM LABOR
    LANG, JM
    LIEBERMAN, E
    RYAN, KJ
    MONSON, RR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 132 (02) : 304 - 309
  • [39] Interpregnancy Interval and Pregnancy Outcomes Causal or Not?
    Klebanoff, Mark A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (03): : 405 - 407
  • [40] Interpregnancy interval and the risk of premature infants
    Fuentes-Afflick, E
    Hessol, NA
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (03): : 383 - 390