Cervical ripening with the Foley catheter

被引:11
作者
Cromi, A. [1 ]
Ghezzi, F. [1 ]
Tomera, S. [1 ]
Uccella, S. [1 ]
Lischetti, B. [1 ]
Bolis, P. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Osped F Del Ponte, I-21100 Varese, Italy
关键词
cervical ripening; chorioamnionitis; endometritis; Foley catheter; induction of labor; mechanical method;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.10.014
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes in a large series of patients undergoing cervical ripening with a Foley catheter. Methods: The database of the Labor and Delivery Unit of the University of a teaching. hospital in Italy was used to identify consecutive patients with a Bishop score (BS) of 4 or less who underwent pre-induction cervical ripening with a Foley catheter. The main outcome measures were clinical chorioamnionitis, endometritis, and suspected and culture-proven neonatal sepsis. Results: Of 602 women undergoing cervical ripening with a Foley catheter, 160 (26.6%) went into active labor without additional interventions. Oxytocin was administered immediately after removal of the Foley catheter in 188 (31.2%) of the women, and 254 (42.2%) required an application of prostaglandin E2 vaginal get. The cesarean delivery rate was 25.6%. The median time to delivery was 1469 min (range, 94-3350 min). Of the women who gave birth vaginally, 225 (50.2%) were delivered within 24 h. Clinical chorioamnionitis and postpartum endometritis occurred in 3 (0.5%) and 6 (1.0%) of the women, respectively. Neonatal sepsis was suspected in 4 (0.7%) of the newborns but blood culture results were negative in all cases. Conclusion: Transcervical use of the Foley catheter is safe for pre-induction cervical ripening, and the associated risk of maternal or perinatal infections is negligible. (C) 2006 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 109
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor [J].
Afolabi, BB ;
Oyeneyin, OL ;
Ogedengbe, OK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 89 (03) :263-267
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, MMWR Recomm Rep, V45, P1
[3]   Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: A randomized trial of 3 techniques [J].
Barrilleaux, PS ;
Bofill, JA ;
Terrone, DA ;
Magann, EF ;
May, WL ;
Morrison, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (06) :1124-1129
[4]  
Boulvain M, 2001, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[5]   RIPENING OF CERVIX WITH EXTRA-AMNIOTIC PROSTAGLANDIN-E2 IN VISCOUS GEL BEFORE INDUCTION OF LABOR [J].
CALDER, AA ;
EMBREY, MP ;
TAIT, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1977, 84 (04) :264-268
[6]   A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction [J].
Chung, JH ;
Huang, WH ;
Rumney, PJ ;
Garite, TJ ;
Nageotte, MP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (04) :1031-1035
[7]  
CUNNINGHAM FG, 2005, WILLIAMS OBSTET, P712
[8]   Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening [J].
Dalui, R ;
Suri, V ;
Ray, P ;
Gupta, I .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 84 (04) :362-367
[9]   Extra-amniotic Foley catheter and prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening at term gestation [J].
Ghezzi, F ;
Massimo, F ;
Raio, L ;
Di Naro, E ;
Balestreri, D ;
Bolis, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2001, 97 (02) :183-187
[10]  
Hibbard J U, 1998, Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol, V6, P18, DOI 10.1155/S1064744998000052