Perceptions and care Recommendations from Previvors: Qualitative analysis of female BRCA1/2 mutation Carriers' experience with genetic testing and counseling

被引:9
作者
Dibble, Kate E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Donorfio, Laura K. M. [2 ]
Britner, Preston A. [2 ]
Bellizzi, Keith M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Dept Human Dev & Family Sci, 348 Mansfield Rd U-1058, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth JHSPH, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
来源
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS | 2022年 / 41卷
关键词
BRCA1; BRCA2; Genetic counseling; Breast cancer; Public health; Qualitative methods; EDUCATIONAL-SUPPORT GROUPS; BREAST-CANCER RISK; OVARIAN-CANCER; HEREDITARY BREAST; DECISION-MAKING; WOMEN; SATISFACTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.gore.2022.100989
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: It is estimated that 12.5% of women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and 1.10% with ovarian cancer during their lifetime. Although less common, women with these mutations have a 11-72% increased risk of breast/ovarian cancers and are hereditary. Genetic testing/counseling presents the opportunity to identify carriers of BRCA1/2 genetic mutations before a cancer diagnosis. Methods: Thirty-four BRCA1/2-positive women (with and without histories of breast/ovarian cancers) were recruited through online national support groups to gain a better understanding of their genetic testing/counseling perceptions and experiences. After confirming eligibility, they were invited to participate in either a telephone or webcam interview. Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative thematic text analysis and descriptive coding techniques. Results: Six major themes emerged, capturing the perceptions and experiences of genetic testing/counseling for these women: 1) Emotional Reactions to Results and Genetic Counseling, 2) Future Recommendations, 3) Family Solidarity and Support, 4) Experiences with the Healthcare System, 5) Preventive Concerns and Decisions, and 6) Sources Affecting Perceived Risk. Two subthemes also emerged within the first theme, which are termed "Previvor," and "Testing Intuition." Conclusions: Participants indicated that genetic testing/counseling improvements would be helpful for women in this population surrounding quality care, including sensitivity training for healthcare professionals involved in testing/counseling, additional educational resources, and increased emotional and financial support. Although these recommendations may be beneficial, more widespread research with greater generalizability to disparate groups may be necessary prior to implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] AssessYourRisk.org, 2022, ASS YOUR RISK
  • [2] Identifying Needs: a Qualitative Study of women's Experiences Regarding Rapid Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in the DNA BONus Study
    Augestad, Mirjam Tonheim
    Hoberg-Vetti, Hildegunn
    Bjorvatn, Cathrine
    Sekse, Ragnhild Johanne Tveit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2017, 26 (01) : 182 - 189
  • [3] BeBRCAware.org, 2022, BRCA NUMB
  • [4] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [5] Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN SPORT EXERCISE AND HEALTH, 2019, 11 (04) : 589 - 597
  • [6] Challenges in managing genetic cancer risk: a long-term qualitative study of unaffected women carrying BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations
    Caiata-Zufferey, Maria
    Pagani, Olivia
    Cina, Viviane
    Membrez, Veronique
    Taborelli, Monica
    Unger, Sheila
    Murphy, Anne
    Monnerat, Christian
    Chappuis, Pierre O.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 17 (09) : 726 - 732
  • [7] Risk Perception and Psychological Distress in Genetic Counselling for Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer
    Cicero, G.
    De Luca, R.
    Dorangricchia, P.
    Lo Coco, G.
    Guarnaccia, C.
    Fanale, D.
    Calo, V.
    Russo, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2017, 26 (05) : 999 - 1007
  • [8] Evaluation of a Streamlined Oncologist-Led BRCA Mutation Testing and Counseling Model for Patients With Ovarian Cancer
    Colombo, Nicoletta
    Huang, Gloria
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Chalas, Eva
    Pignata, Sandro
    Fiorica, James
    Van Le, Linda
    Ghamande, Sharad
    Gonzalez-Santiago, Santiago
    Bover, Isabel
    Grana Suarez, Begona
    Green, Andrew
    Huot-Marchand, Philippe
    Bourhis, Yann
    Karve, Sudeep
    Blakeley, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (13) : 1300 - +
  • [9] Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian, Version 2.2015 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines
    Daly, Mary B.
    Pilarski, Robert
    Axilbund, Jennifer E.
    Berry, Michael
    Buys, Saundra S.
    Crawford, Beth
    Farmer, Meagan
    Friedman, Susan
    Garber, Judy E.
    Khan, Seema
    Klein, Catherine
    Kohlmann, Wendy
    Kurian, Allison
    Litton, Jennifer K.
    Madlensky, Lisa
    Marcom, P. Kelly
    Merajver, Sofia D.
    Offit, Kenneth
    Pal, Tuya
    Rana, Huma
    Reiser, Gwen
    Robson, Mark E.
    Shannon, Kristen Mahoney
    Swisher, Elizabeth
    Voian, Nicoleta C.
    Weitzel, Jeffrey N.
    Whelan, Alison
    Wick, Myra J.
    Wiesner, Georgia L.
    Dwyer, Mary
    Kumar, Rashmi
    Darlow, Susan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2016, 14 (02): : 153 - 162
  • [10] Men's and Women's Approaches to Disclosure About BRCA-Related Cancer Risks and Family Planning Decision-Making
    Dean, Marleah
    Rauscher, Emily A.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2018, 28 (14) : 2155 - 2168