Which recommendations are considered essential for outbreak preparedness by first responders?

被引:15
作者
Belfroid, Evelien [1 ,2 ]
Timen, Aura [2 ]
van Steenbergen, Jim E. [2 ]
Huis, Anita [1 ]
Hulscher, Marlies E. J. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, IQ Healthcare, Med Ctr, Geert Grootepl 21, NL-6525 EZ Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, Preparedness & Response Unit, Ctr Infect Dis Control, Antoni van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, NL-3721 MA Bilthoven, Netherlands
来源
BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES | 2017年 / 17卷
关键词
HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS; INFECTIOUS-DISEASES; SARS; CHALLENGES; NURSES; TAIWAN; H1N1; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12879-017-2293-0
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Preparedness is considered essential for healthcare organizations to respond effectively to outbreaks. In the current study we aim to capture the views of first responders on what they consider key recommendations for high quality preparedness. Furthermore, we identified the recommendations with the highest urgency from the perspective of first responders. Methods: We chose a multistep approach using a systematic Delphi procedure. Previously extracted recommendations from scientific literature were presented to a national and two international expert panels. We asked the experts to score the recommendations based on relevance for high quality preparedness. In addition we asked them to choose the ten most urgent recommendations. Results: Starting with 80 recommendations from scientific literature, 49 key recommendations were selected by both international expert panels. Differences between both panels were mainly on triage protocols. In addition, large differences were found in the selection of the ten most urgent recommendations. Conclusions: In this study infectious disease experts selected a set of key recommendations representing high quality preparedness and specified which ones should be given the highest urgency when preparing for a future crisis. These key recommendations can be used to shape their preparedness activities.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   A review of instruments assessing public health preparedness [J].
Asch, SM ;
Stoto, M ;
Mendes, M ;
Valdez, RB ;
Gallagher, ME ;
Halverson, P ;
Lurie, N .
PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2005, 120 (05) :532-542
[2]  
Beaujean DJMA, 2010, NED TIJDSCHR GENEES, V154, P897
[3]   Triage Care of the Critically Ill and Injured During Pandemics and Disasters: CHEST Consensus Statement [J].
Christian, Michael D. ;
Sprung, Charles L. ;
King, Mary A. ;
Dichter, Jeffrey R. ;
Kissoon, Niranjan ;
Devereaux, Asha V. ;
Gomersall, Charles D. .
CHEST, 2014, 146 (04) :E61S-E74S
[4]  
Cowperthwaite C., 2015, TAR HEEL NURSE, V77
[5]  
Division of State and Local Readiness in the Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response (OPHPR), 2011, PUBL HLTH PREP CAP N, P148
[6]  
*ECDC, 2010, JOINT EUR PAND PREP
[7]  
Fitch KBSJ., 2001, The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user's manual. RAND
[8]   Factors Associated With the Ability and Willingness of Essential Workers to Report to Duty During a Pandemic [J].
Gershon, Robyn R. M. ;
Magda, Lori A. ;
Qureshi, Kristine A. ;
Riley, Halley E. M. ;
Scanlon, Eileen ;
Carney, Maria Torroella ;
Richards, Reginald J. ;
Sherman, Martin F. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2010, 52 (10) :995-1003
[9]   Global trends in emerging infectious diseases [J].
Jones, Kate E. ;
Patel, Nikkita G. ;
Levy, Marc A. ;
Storeygard, Adam ;
Balk, Deborah ;
Gittleman, John L. ;
Daszak, Peter .
NATURE, 2008, 451 (7181) :990-U4
[10]   Nurses' perceptions of risk from emerging respiratory infectious diseases: A Singapore study [J].
Koh, Yiwen ;
Hegney, Desley ;
Drury, Vicki .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (02) :195-204