Applying portfolio theory-based modified ABC to electricity generation mix

被引:5
作者
Adabi, Farid [1 ]
Mozafari, Babak [1 ]
Ranjbar, Ali Mohammad [2 ]
Soleymani, Soodabeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Sci & Res Branch, Dept Power Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Sharif Univ Technol, Dept Power Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Portfolio optimization; ABC algorithm; Electricity generation investment; Wind power; PRICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.09.008
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Portfolio theory has found its model in numerous engineering applications for optimizing the electrical generation mix of an electricity area. However, to have better performance of this theory, this paper presents a new heuristic method as known modified artificial bee colony (MABC) to portfolio optimization problem. Moreover, we consider both dis-patchable and non-dis-patchable constrains variables and energy sources. Note that the proposed MABC method uses a Chaotic Local Search (CLS) to enhance the self searching ability of the original ABC algorithm. Resulting, in this paper a portfolio theory-based MABC model that explicitly distinguishes between electricity generation (energy), installed capacity (power) and actual instantaneous power delivery is proposed. Therefore, in this model, the uncertainties of wind power and ramp-up/down constrains of traditional power plants are correctly considered in the investment cost. The numerical results show the great potential of proposed model with lowest risk on generation cost. Also, they are show that MABC approach is successful in portfolio optimization. (c) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 362
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   The regional electricity generation mix in Scotland: A portfolio selection approach incorporating marine technologies [J].
Allan, Grant ;
Eromenko, Igor ;
McGregor, Peter ;
Swales, Kim .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (01) :6-22
[2]   Extension of portfolio theory application to energy planning problem - The Italian case [J].
Arnesano, M. ;
Carlucci, A. P. ;
Laforgia, D. .
ENERGY, 2012, 39 (01) :112-124
[3]   DO CONSUMERS DISCOUNT THE FUTURE CORRECTLY - A MARKET-BASED VALUATION OF RESIDENTIAL FUEL SWITCHING [J].
AWERBUCH, S ;
DEEHAN, W .
ENERGY POLICY, 1995, 23 (01) :57-69
[4]  
Awerbuch S., 1993, The Electricity Journal, V6, P20, DOI DOI 10.1016/1040-6190(93)90048-P
[5]  
Awerbuch S., 1995, The Electricity Journal, V8, P50, DOI DOI 10.1016/1040-6190(95)90201-5
[6]  
AWERBUCH S, 2004, BUILDING CAPACITY PO
[7]   PORTFOLIO APPROACH TO FOSSIL-FUEL PROCUREMENT IN ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY [J].
BARLEV, D ;
KATZ, S .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1976, 31 (03) :933-947
[8]   A comparative analysis of business structures suitable for farmer-owned wind power projects in the United States [J].
Bolinger, M ;
Wiser, R .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (14) :1750-1761
[9]   Accounting for fuel price risk when comparing renewable to gas-fired generation: the role of forward natural gas prices [J].
Bolinger, M ;
Wiser, R ;
Golove, W .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (06) :706-720
[10]  
Bolinger M., 2005, ELECT J, V18, P78