Validation of a reflection rubric for higher education

被引：3

作者：

Rogers, Jordan ^{[1
]}

Peecksen, Scott ^{[2
]}

Douglas, Megan ^{[3
]}

Simmons, Mike ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ North Texas, Dept Counseling & Higher Educ, Denton, TX 76203 USA

[2] Univ North Texas, Career Connect, 1155 Union Circle 311555, Denton, TX 76203 USA

[3] Univ North Texas, Dept Psychol, Denton, TX 76203 USA

来源：

REFLECTIVE PRACTICE | 2019年 / 20卷 / 06期

关键词：

Reflection; higher education; psychometrically valid; learning; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; AGREEMENT; STUDENTS; SERVICE;

D O I：

10.1080/14623943.2019.1676712

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

Reflection in learning is a popular and widely studied concept that has historical roots in higher education. Previous authors reported little agreement on the assessment methods and procedures for measuring reflection. Moreover, many studies have not provided sufficient detail on the development or implementation of their reflection rubrics, and only some reported psychometric support for reliability or validity. These challenges make it difficult to identify a standardized assessment process for reflection that is reliable and valid for use across different disciplines in higher education. The current study provides preliminary support for a reflection rubric for college students that is theoretically- and empirically-based and psychometrically supported, using student data that represents several academic disciplines and a variety of student groups. The authors describe the development of a reflection rubric in detail; present results that support its reliability, validity, and use among college students from different disciplines to promote and actively practice a rigorous and standardized process for written reflection; present the rubric?s limitations; and describe plans for future research, including additional tests of validity.

引用

页码：761 / 776

页数：16

共 42 条

[21]

Heron J., 1985, REFLECTION TURNING E

[22]

Hooper D., 2008, ELECT J BUSINESS RES, V6, P53

[23] Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].

Hu, Li-tze ;

Bentler, Peter M. .

STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55

[24]

King P., 1994, Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults

[25]

King P.M., 2000, NEW DIRECTIONS TEACH, V82, P15

[26] Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood [J].

King, PM ;

Kitchener, KS .

EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2004, 39 (01) :5-18

[27]

Knight-McKenna M., 2011, International Journal of Teaching Learning in Higher Education, V23, P208

[28] The Learning Way Meta-cognitive Aspects of Experiential Learning [J].

Kolb, Alice Y. ;

Kolb, David A. .

SIMULATION & GAMING, 2009, 40 (03) :297-327

[29] MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].

LANDIS, JR ;

KOCH, GG .

BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174

[30] Self-reflection and academic performance: is there a relationship? [J].

Lew, Magdeleine D. N. ;

Schmidt, Henk G. .

ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2011, 16 (04) :529-545

← 1 2 3 4 5 →