40 years of loyalty programs: how effective are they? Generalizations from a meta-analysis

被引:37
作者
Belli, Alex [1 ]
O'rourke, Anne-Maree [2 ]
Carrillat, Francois A. [3 ]
Pupovac, Ljubomir [4 ]
Melnyk, Valentyna [4 ]
Napolova, Ekaterina [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] HEC Montreal, 3000 Chemin Cote St Catherine, Montreal, PQ H3T 2A7, Canada
[4] UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[5] Rabobank Australia, 201 Sussex St, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
关键词
Loyalty programs; Loyalty cards; Reward programs; Customer loyalty; Firm performance; Relationship marketing; Meta-analysis; CUSTOMER LOYALTY; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; PURCHASE BEHAVIOR; FREQUENCY REWARD; PUBLICATION BIAS; SERVICE QUALITY; SALES IMPACT; SATISFACTION; SHARE; MEMBERSHIP;
D O I
10.1007/s11747-021-00804-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite firms' extensive usage of loyalty programs (LPs) and decades-long academic research on their effectiveness, LPs' effects on customer loyalty are still heavily debated. We perform a comprehensive meta-analysis of loyalty programs across various LP designs and industries and spanning different performance metrics to identify moderators of LP effectiveness. Based on a data set with 429 effect sizes, published or available between 1990 and 2020, we find strong evidence that LPs enhance customer loyalty. However, while LPs particularly enhance behavioral loyalty, shifting consumers' attitudinal loyalty is more challenging. Further, LP effectiveness differs systematically depending on LP design characteristics (LP structure, reward content and delivery) and industry characteristics. These effects are enabled by both cognitive and affective drivers, acting sequentially, as underlying mechanisms. Despite a wide range of methodologies investigating LPs' effectiveness, methodological choices have little impact on the substantive results. We develop a comprehensive research agenda and managerial implications.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 173
页数:27
相关论文
共 139 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CISION PR NEWS WIRE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, J. Target. Meas. Anal. Mark.
[3]   The effect of loyalty program fees on program perceptions and engagement [J].
Ashley, Christy ;
Gillespie, Erin A. ;
Noble, Stephanie M. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (02) :964-973
[4]   Status demotion in hierarchical loyalty programs and its effects on switching: Identifying mediators and moderators in the Chinese context [J].
Banik, Shanta ;
Gao, Yongqiang ;
Rabbanee, Fazlul K. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2019, 96 :125-134
[5]   Does Exclusivity Always Pay Off? Exclusive Price Promotions and Consumer Response [J].
Barone, Michael J. ;
Roy, Tirthankar .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2010, 74 (02) :121-132
[6]   Using meta-analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership-performance relationship [J].
Bergh, Donald D. ;
Aguinis, Herman ;
Heavey, Ciaran ;
Ketchen, David J. ;
Boyd, Brian K. ;
Su, Peiran ;
Lau, Cubie L. L. ;
Joo, Harry .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (03) :477-497
[7]   Developing an effective customer loyalty program [J].
Berman, Barry .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2006, 49 (01) :123-+
[8]  
Beroe Inc, 2019, LOYALT PROGR MARK RE
[9]   When customers are members: Customer retention in paid membership contexts [J].
Bhattacharya, CB .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 1998, 26 (01) :31-44
[10]   UNDERSTANDING THE BOND OF IDENTIFICATION - AN INVESTIGATION OF ITS CORRELATES AMONG ART-MUSEUM MEMBERS [J].
BHATTACHARYA, CB ;
RAO, H ;
GLYNN, MA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1995, 59 (04) :46-57