Review of air kerma-area product, effective dose and dose conversion coefficients for non-cardiac interventional fluoroscopy procedures

被引:9
作者
Miller, Donald L. [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Ctr Devices & Radiol Hlth, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
关键词
air kerma-area product; dose coefficient; effective dose; fluoroscopically guided interventional procedure; interventional radiology; radiation dose; DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS; PATIENT RADIATION-EXPOSURE; RADIOLOGY PROCEDURES; PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS; ANEURYSM REPAIR; ORGAN; STAFF; NEURORADIOLOGY; ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1002/mp.13990
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To provide current data on average air kerma-area product (P-KA) and effective dose (E) for noncardiac interventional fluoroscopy procedures and suggested values of dose coefficients (DCE) for conversion of P-KA to estimates of effective dose. Methods A PubMed literature search covering the time period from 2006 to August 2019 was performed to obtain recent data on P-KA, E and DCE for interventional fluoroscopy procedures. Results There is very wide variation in the reported values of P-KA, E, and DCE in the literature. A number of factors are involved in this variability and the resultant uncertainty in average values of these dose quantities. Conclusions The values of P-KA, average E and suggested DCE presented here can be of use for comparison of the radiation detriment from different procedures and may be useful for categorizing detriment within an order of magnitude or so. They do not represent actual or expected radiation dose or detriment from any specific procedure or for a specific patient and should be not be used as such.
引用
收藏
页码:975 / 982
页数:8
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Patient radiation exposure during diagnostic and therapeutic interventional neuroradiology procedures [J].
Alexander, M. D. ;
Oliff, M. C. ;
Olorunsola, O. G. ;
Brus-Ramer, M. ;
Nickoloff, E. L. ;
Meyers, P. M. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2010, 2 (01) :6-10
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, 606012542009AMD22018
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement report No. 160: Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, ANN ICRP, V26, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0146-6453(00)89195-2
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, NRPBW4
[6]  
Balonov M. I., 2012, Annals of the ICRP, V41, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.06.002
[7]   Comparing Effective Doses During Image-Guided Core Needle Biopsies with Computed Tomography Versus C-Arm Cone Beam CT Using Adult and Pediatric Phantoms [J].
Ben-Shlomo, A. ;
Cohen, D. ;
Bruckheimer, E. ;
Bachar, G. N. ;
Konstantinovsky, R. ;
Birk, E. ;
Atar, E. .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 39 (05) :732-739
[8]  
Bernardi G, 2000, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V51, P1
[9]   Interventional cardiovascular procedures in Belgium: Effective dose and conversion factors [J].
Bogaert, E. ;
Bacher, K. ;
Thierens, H. .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2008, 129 (1-3) :77-82
[10]   A large-scale multicentre study of patient skin doses in interventional cardiology: dose-area product action levels and dose reference levels [J].
Bogaert, E. ;
Bacher, K. ;
Lemmens, K. ;
Carlier, M. ;
Desmet, W. ;
De Wagter, X. ;
Djian, D. ;
Hanet, C. ;
Heyndrickx, G. ;
Legrand, V. ;
Taeymans, Y. ;
Thierens, H. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 82 (976) :303-312