Overview of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for receptor positive breast cancer in post menopausal women

被引:1
|
作者
Paepke, S
Harbeck, N
Jacobs, VR
Schwarz-Boeger, U
von Steinburg, SP
Fischer, T
Diedrich, F
Blohmer, JU
Warm, M
Huober, J
Wolfs, C
Eiermann, W
Kiechle, M
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Frauenklin Rechts Isar, Leitender Oberarzt Diagnost & Operat Senol, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Frauenklin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Charite, Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Cologne, Frauenklin, Cologne, Germany
[5] Univ Tubingen, Frauenklin, Tubingen, Germany
[6] Frauenklin Rot Kreuz, Munich, Germany
关键词
breast cancer; neoadjuvant endocrine therapy; anastrozole; exemestane; letrozole; breast conserving therapy;
D O I
10.1055/s-2004-830391
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
For elderly women, great importance is increasingly being attached to the question of breast conservation. Current data confirms the concept of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy as an option in postmenopausal women to reduce the volume of locally advanced carcinomas and thereby increase the rate of breast conserving operations. Moreover, in vivo testing of the effectiveness of endocrine neoadjuvance is important for subsequent adjuvant therapy. Endocrine therapy is also particularly well tolerated. Current data are available, although to different degrees, both for tamoxifen and for all aromatase inhibitors. Initial neoadjuvant treatment studies with tamoxifen showed clinical response rates of 49 to 68% with a median reduction in tumour volume of 58%. Studies comparing adjuvant tamoxifen with primary tamoxifen treatment and subsequent surgery in the event of disease progression found no difference in total survival. For the aromatase inhibitors, results were variable overall: In the IMPACT study (Phase III) anastrozole, tamoxifen or the two drugs combined showed no difference with respect to response after 3 months (anastrozole 37.2%, tamoxifen 36.1%); an increased rate of breast conserving operations was achieved with anastrozole (45.2%) compared with tamoxifen (22.2%). Exemestane, at 88.6%, has a greater response than tamoxifen (57.2%) (Phase II) and letrozole shows a response of 55-92% compared with 36% for tamoxifen (Phase II and III). Extension of the neoadjuvant therapy phase with exemestane to 4-5 months improved the response, with further increases in the rates of complete remission based on clinical and pathological evidence and an increased rate of breast conservation of 45.2%; figures for letrozole at 6-8 months were 67.0%. Data on the long-term outcome are not yet available. Future studies are focusing on optimisation of the treatment period, the search for reliable predictive markers and improvement of the therapeutic index.
引用
收藏
页码:1290 / 1298
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimal Treatment Duration of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Women Aged 60 Years or Older with Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer
    Hayashi, Yuji
    Takei, Hiroyuki
    Saito, Tsuyoshi
    Kai, Toshihiro
    Inoue, Kenichi
    Kurosumi, Masafumi
    Ninomiya, Jun
    JOURNAL OF NIPPON MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2021, 88 (04) : 354 - 360
  • [22] Information for decision making by post-menopausal women with hormone receptor positive early-stage breast cancer considering adjuvant endocrine therapy
    Feldman-Stewart, Deb
    Madarnas, Yolanda
    Mates, Mihaela
    Tong, Christine
    Grunfeld, Eva
    Verma, Shailendra
    Carolan, Hannah
    Brundage, Michael
    BREAST, 2013, 22 (05) : 919 - 925
  • [23] Long-Term Outcome of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy with Aromatase Inhibitors in Elderly Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
    Antonino Grassadonia
    Marta Di Nicola
    Simona Grossi
    Paolo Noccioli
    Saveria Tavoletta
    Roberto Politi
    Domenico Angelucci
    Camilla Marinelli
    Marinella Zilli
    Giampiero Ausili Cefaro
    Nicola Tinari
    Michele De Tursi
    Laura Iezzi
    Pasquale Cioffi
    Stefano Iacobelli
    Clara Natoli
    Ettore Cianchetti
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2014, 21 : 1575 - 1582
  • [24] Efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pre-menopausal patients with oestrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative, lymph node-positive breast cancer
    Hee Jeong Kim
    Woo Chul Noh
    Eun Sook Lee
    Yong Sik Jung
    Lee Su Kim
    Wonshik Han
    Seok Jin Nam
    Gyung -Yub Gong
    Hwa Jung Kim
    Sei Hyun Ahn
    Breast Cancer Research, 22
  • [25] Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone-receptor positive breast cancer
    Strasser-Weippl, Kathrin
    Badovinac-Crnjevic, Tanja
    Fan, Lei
    Goss, Paul E.
    BREAST, 2013, 22 : S171 - S175
  • [26] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Hong-Fang
    Shen, Jun
    Xu, Bin
    Shen, Jian-Guo
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (46)
  • [27] Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: A potential strategy for ER-positive breast cancer
    Yao, Li-Tong
    Wang, Mo-Zhi
    Wang, Meng-Shen
    Yu, Xue-Ting
    Guo, Jing-Yi
    Sun, Tie
    Li, Xin-Yan
    Xu, Ying-Ying
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2019, 7 (15) : 1937 - 1953
  • [28] Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Spring, Laura M.
    Gupta, Arjun
    Reynolds, Kerry L.
    Gadd, Michele A.
    Ellisen, Leif W.
    Isakoff, Steven J.
    Moy, Beverly
    Bardia, Aditya
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2016, 2 (11) : 1477 - 1486
  • [29] Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: A potential strategy for ER-positive breast cancer
    Li-Tong Yao
    Mo-Zhi Wang
    Meng-Shen Wang
    Xue-Ting Yu
    Jing-Yi Guo
    Tie Sun
    Xin-Yan Li
    Ying-Ying Xu
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2019, (15) : 1937 - 1953
  • [30] Duration and effect of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy on invasive tumor cellularity in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
    Amanda Sutherland Beck
    Michelle Earley
    Megan Troxell
    Jacqueline Tsai
    Melinda L. Telli
    Irene L. Wapnir
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2025, 212 (2) : 269 - 276