Perceived contributions of multifunctional landscapes to human well-being: Evidence from 13 European sites

被引:85
作者
Fagerholm, Nora [1 ]
Martin-Lopez, Berta [2 ]
Torralba, Mario [3 ]
Oteros-Rozas, Elisa [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Lechner, Alex M. [7 ]
Bieling, Claudia [8 ]
Olafsson, Anton Stahl [9 ]
Albert, Christian [10 ,11 ]
Raymond, Christopher M. [12 ]
Garcia-Martin, Maria [13 ]
Gulsrud, Natalie [9 ]
Plieninger, Tobias [3 ,13 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept Geog & Geol, Turku, Finland
[2] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Fac Sustainabil, Inst Eth & Transdisciplinary Sustainabil Res, Luneburg, Germany
[3] Univ Kassel, Fac Organ Agr Sci, Witzenhausen, Germany
[4] Univ Cent Catalunya, Univ Vic, Chair Agroecol & Food Syst, Bercelona, Vic, Spain
[5] FRACTAL Collect, Madrid, Spain
[6] Pablo de Olavide Univ, Social & Participatory Act Res Grp, Seville, Spain
[7] Univ Nottingham Malaysia, Sch Environm & Geog Sci, Semenyih, Malaysia
[8] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Social Sci Agr, Societal Transit & Agr 430b, Stuttgart, Germany
[9] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Geosci & Nat Resource Management, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[10] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Environm Planning, Hannover, Germany
[11] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Inst Geog, Bochum, Germany
[12] Univ Helsinki, Fac Agr & Forestry, Helsinki Inst Sustainabil Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[13] Georg August Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, Gottingen, Germany
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
ecosystem services; free listing; human well-being; landscape planning; multifunctional landscapes; PPGIS; quality of life; self-reported well-being; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SOCIAL VALUES; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; MENTAL-HEALTH; LAND-USE; FRAMEWORK; COMMUNITY; BENEFITS; LIFE; CONNECTEDNESS;
D O I
10.1002/pan3.10067
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. Multifunctional landscapes provide critical benefits and are essential for human well-being. The relationship between multifunctional landscapes and well-being has mostly been studied using ecosystem services as a linkage. However, there is a challenge of concretizing what human well-being exactly is and how it can be measured, particularly in relation to ecosystem services, landscape values and related discussions. 2. In this paper, we measure self-reported well-being through applying an inductive free-listing approach to the exploration of the relationships between landscape multifunctionality and human well-being across 13 rural and peri-urban sites in Europe. 3. We developed a face-to-face online survey (n = 2,301 respondents) integrating subjective perceptions of well-being (free-listing method) with mapping perceived ecosystem service benefits (Public Participation GIS, PPGIS approach). 4. Applying content analysis and diverse statistical methods, we explore the links between well-being (i.e. perceived well-being items such as tranquillity, social relations and health) and social-ecological properties (i.e. respondents' sociocultural characteristics and perception of ecosystem service benefits). 5. We identify 40 different well-being items highlighting prominently landscape values. The items form five distinct clusters: access to services; tranquillity and social capital; health and nature; cultural landscapes; and place attachment. Each cluster is related to specific study sites and explained by certain social-ecological properties. 6. Results of our inductive approach further specify pre-defined conceptualizations on well-being and their connections to the natural environment. Results suggest that the well-being contributions of multifunctional landscapes are connected to therapeutic well-being effects, which are largely neglected in the ecosystem services literature. 7. Our results further point to the context-specific character of linkages between landscapes and human well-being. The clusters highlight that landscape-supported well-being is related to multiple interlinked items that can inform collective visions of well-being in the future. 8. For landscape planning and management, we highlight the need for place-specific analysis and consideration of perceptions of local people to identify the contributions to their well-being. 9. Future research would benefit from considering the experiential qualities of value and well-being as they relate to direct experiences with the landscape and wider psychological needs, specifically over time.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 234
页数:18
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]  
Andrews G. J., 2018, HLTH GEOGRAPHIES CRI, P59
[2]   Nature-assisted therapy: Systematic review of controlled and observational studies [J].
Annerstedt, Matilda ;
Wahrborg, Peter .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 39 (04) :371-388
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, REAL LIFE EC UNDERST
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities: final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on "Nature based solutions and re naturing cities.", DOI [10.2777/765301fullversion, DOI 10.2777/765301FULLVERSION, 10.2777/479582]
[6]   Food and wellbeing. Towards a consumer-based approach [J].
Ares, Gaston ;
De Saldamando, Luis ;
Gimenez, Ana ;
Deliza, Rosires .
APPETITE, 2014, 74 :61-69
[7]   Seeking everyday wellbeing: The coast as a therapeutic landscape [J].
Bell, Sarah L. ;
Phoenix, Cassandra ;
Lovell, Rebecca ;
Wheeler, Benedict W. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2015, 142 :56-67
[8]   Linkages between landscapes and human well-being: An empirical exploration with short interviews [J].
Bieling, Claudia ;
Plieninger, Tobias ;
Pirker, Heidemarie ;
Vogl, Christian R. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 105 :19-30
[9]   Capturing synergies between rural development and agricultural mitigation in Brazil [J].
Branca, Giacomo ;
Hissa, Helga ;
Benez, Mara Cristina ;
Medeiros, Katia ;
Lipper, Leslie ;
Tinlot, Marianne ;
Bockel, Louis ;
Bernoux, Martial .
LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 30 (01) :507-518
[10]   Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: A review and evaluation [J].
Brown, Greg ;
Fagerholm, Nora .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 13 :119-133