A comparative study on Ant Colony Optimization algorithm approaches for solving multi-objective path planning problems in case of unmanned surface vehicles

被引:0
作者
Ntakolia, Charis [1 ,2 ]
Lyridis, Dimitrios, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Lab Maritime Transport, GR-15780 Zografos, Greece
[2] Hellen AF Acad, Dept Aeronaut Studies, Sect Mat Engn Machining Technol & Prod Management, Acharnes 13672, Greece
关键词
Ant colony optimization; Multi-objective path planning; Unmanned surface vehicles; Fuzzy logic;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The increased use of unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) to various applications in complex environments has led to the need of novel path planning approaches that can effectively address multi-objective path planning problems. Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) is a well-known and popular path search algorithm for graph-based problems that finds the shortest path. It has been widely used for solving path planning problems for robotic vehicles, and unmanned aircraft and surface vehicles, among others. To this end, this study focuses on extending the use of ACO to cope with multiple objectives by using fuzzy inference systems, such as Mamdani and Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK), or the root mean square error (RMSE) criterion adopted to the state-of-the-art SIGPA algorithm. A comparative evaluation of these approaches is conducted in the context of solving different scenarios of multi-objective USV path planning problems. The results showed that ACO with Mamdani reached better performance in terms of solution quality compared to the other approaches under examination, while ACO with RMSE presented higher convergence speed and ACO with TSK balanced better among convergence speed and solution quality. Thus, each of the proposed approaches can be considered for multi-objective path planning of USVs depending the application needs.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Antonelli G., 2008, SPRINGER HDB ROBOTIC, P987, DOI [10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5-44, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5-44, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_44]
[2]   Safety, Security, and Rescue Missions with an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Aerial Mosaicking and Autonomous Flight at the 2009 European Land Robots Trials (ELROB) and the 2010 Response Robot Evaluation Exercises (RREE) [J].
Birk, Andreas ;
Wiggerich, Burkhard ;
Buelow, Heiko ;
Pfingsthorn, Max ;
Schwertfeger, Soeren .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 2011, 64 (01) :57-76
[3]   Ant colony optimization: Introduction and recent trends [J].
Blum, Christian .
PHYSICS OF LIFE REVIEWS, 2005, 2 (04) :353-373
[4]   A Hybrid Path Planning Algorithm for Unmanned Surface Vehicles in Complex Environment With Dynamic Obstacles [J].
Chen, Zheng ;
Zhang, Youming ;
Zhang, Yougong ;
Nie, Yong ;
Tang, Jianzhong ;
Zhu, Shiqiang .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :126439-126449
[5]   Implementation of Fuzzy-Based Robotic Path Planning [J].
Davis, Divya ;
Supriya, P. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, IC3T 2015, VOL 2, 2016, 380 :375-383
[6]  
Ding FG, 2018, OCEANS 2018 MTS/IEEE CHARLESTON
[7]   Two-Dimensional Robust Magnetic Resonance Navigation of a Ferromagnetic Microrobot Using Pareto Optimality [J].
Folio, David ;
Ferreira, Antoine .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS, 2017, 33 (03) :583-593
[8]   A Comparison of Mamdani and Sugeno Fuzzy Inference Systems for Evaluating the Quality of Experience of Hapto-Audio-Visual Applications [J].
Hamam, Abdelwahab ;
Georganas, Nicolas D. .
2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON HAPTIC AUDIO VISUAL ENVIRONMENTS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, 2008, :87-92
[9]  
Jang J-SR., 1997, IEEE T AUTOMAT CONTR, V42, P1482, DOI [10.1109/TAC.1997.633847, DOI 10.1109/TAC.1997.633847]
[10]   Self-Adaptive Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance and Path Planning for USV Under Complex Maritime Environment [J].
Liu, Xinyu ;
Li, Yun ;
Zhang, Jing ;
Zheng, Jian ;
Yang, Chunxi .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :114945-114954