Estimation of Goldmann applanation tonometer intraocular pressure (IOP) from scleral Schiotz IOP values in eyes with type-1 keratoprostheses

被引:2
|
作者
Senthil, Sirisha [1 ]
Chary, Raghava [1 ]
Ali, Mohammed Hasnat [2 ]
Choudhari, Nikhil S. [1 ]
Garudadri, Chandra Sekhar [1 ]
机构
[1] LV Prasad Eye Inst, VST Glaucoma Ctr, Dept Glaucoma, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
[2] LV Prasad Eye Inst, Biostat, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
关键词
cornea; glaucoma; intraocular pressure; ocular surface; prosthesis; BOSTON KERATOPROSTHESIS; CORNEAL; GLAUCOMA; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318121
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To validate estimation of Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) intraocular pressure (IOP) from scleral Schiotz IOP measurements using a regression model in normal eyes and eyes with type-1 keratoprostheses. Methods In this prospective cross-sectional study, cohort-1 had 253 normal anterior segment eyes, and cohort-2 had 100 eyes with type-1 keratoprostheses. Scleral Schiotz IOP measurements were used (in a non-linear model) to predict GAT IOP values for these eyes. Accuracy of predicted GAT IOP values was assessed using actual GAT IOP values for normal eyes, while for type-1 keratoprosthetic eyes, finger tension (FT) IOP assessments by an experienced glaucoma specialist were used. Primary outcome was agreement between FT IOP (assessed by an experienced glaucoma specialist) and predicted GAT IOP-derived clusters. Results The actual values of GAT IOP measurements in normal eyes (n=253; mean age +/- SD, 51.35 +/- 15.56 years) ranged between 6 mm Hg and 62 mm Hg (mean=22 +/- 10.05 mm Hg). Estimated and actual GAT IOP values for normal eyes were very similar (mean difference=0.05 mm Hg with limits of agreement: -5.39 to 5.5 by Bland-Altman plot). Of the 100 eyes with type-1 keratoprostheses, 68 were classified as having digitally normal IOP, 28 as borderline and 4 as high. The agreement between classification by FT assessment and model-predicted GAT IOP values was substantial (Kappa=0.81, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.93). The accuracy of the model in assessing IOP was found to be 91% (95% CI 0.84 to 0.96). Conclusion Scleral Schiotz IOP values along with our predictive model can be an alternative objective method to FT IOP in assessing IOP in eyes with type-1 keratoprostheses.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 484
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Agreement of intraocular pressure measurement by scleral Schiotz and Goldmann applanation tonometer
    Shaikh, Zeba Muzammil
    Rajalakshmi, A. R.
    Nagarajan, Swathi
    Lokeshmaran, A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [2] Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP): comparison in the same eyes after subsequent medical normalization of IOP
    Yoo, Chungkwon
    Eom, Young Sub
    Kim, Yong Yeon
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 248 (11) : 1611 - 1616
  • [3] IOP measurement in silicone oil tamponade eyes by Corvis ST tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry
    Zhang, Yang
    Zheng, Lin
    Bian, Ailing
    Zhou, Qi
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 38 (02) : 697 - 703
  • [4] Schiotz Scleral Intraocular Pressure Readings Predict Goldmann Applanation Readings Better Than Rebound Tonometry
    Senthil, Sirisha
    Chary, Raghava
    Ali, Mohammed Hasnat
    Choudhari, Nikhil
    Badakere, Swathi
    Krishnamurthy, Rashmi
    Dikshit, Siddharth
    Garudadri, Chandrasekhar
    CORNEA, 2019, 38 (09) : 1117 - 1123
  • [5] A comparison of intraocular pressure values obtained using a Goldmann applanation tonometer and a handheld version of applanation resonance tonometer: A preliminary report
    Mulak, Malgorzata
    Czak, Wojciech A.
    Mimier, Malgorzata
    Kaczmarek, Radoslaw
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 27 (04): : 481 - 485
  • [6] Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare® Home rebound tonometer (model TA022) and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients
    Valero, B.
    Fenolland, J. -R.
    Rosenberg, R.
    Sendon, D.
    Mesnard, C.
    Sigaux, M.
    Giraud, J. -M.
    Renard, J. -P.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2017, 40 (10): : 865 - 875
  • [7] IOP agreement between I-Care TA01 rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer in eyes with and without glaucoma
    Sinha, Gautam
    Gupta, Shikha
    Temkar, Shreyas
    Pandey, Veena
    Sihota, Ramanjit
    Dada, Tanuj
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 35 (01) : 89 - 93
  • [8] ASSESSMENT OF THE FACTORS INFLUENCING AND COMPARING THE INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE WITH THE HELP OF SCHIOTZ INDENTATION TONOMETER AND GOLDMANN'S APPLANATION TONOMETER: A CLINICAL STUDY
    Amarnath, Mridula V.
    Samuel, Christina
    Sundararajan, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2015, 4 (01): : 58 - 64
  • [9] IOP measurement in silicone oil tamponade eyes by Corvis ST tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry
    Yang Zhang
    Lin Zheng
    Ailing Bian
    Qi Zhou
    International Ophthalmology, 2018, 38 : 697 - 703
  • [10] Clinical comparison of ocular blood flow tonometer, tonopen, and Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in postkeratoplasty eyes
    Rao, VJ
    Gnanaraj, L
    Mitchell, KW
    Figueiredo, FC
    CORNEA, 2001, 20 (08) : 834 - 838