Response rate and content differences between web and mail surveys

被引:2
作者
Leone, Erin Hoerl [1 ]
Bankovich, Brittany [2 ]
Morales, Nia [3 ]
Sauby, Kristen [1 ]
Shields, Roger [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Fish & Wildlife Res Inst, Ctr Biostat & Modeling, 1105 SW Williston Rd, Gainesville, FL 32653 USA
[2] Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Fish & Wildlife Res Inst, Ctr Spatial Anal, 1105 SW Williston Rd, Gainesville, FL 32653 USA
[3] Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Freshwater Fisheries Res, Fish & Wildlife Res Inst, 7386 NW 71st St, Gainesville, FL 32653 USA
[4] Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Div Hunting & Game Management, Wild Turkey Management, 3911 Highway 2321, Panama City, FL 32409 USA
[5] Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agcy, Wildlife & Forestry Div, 5107 Edmondson Pike, Nashville, TN 37211 USA
关键词
hunter demographics; hunter harvest surveys; survey response rates; web surveys; NONRESPONSE RATES; BIAS; ISSUES; IMPACT; MODE;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.1292
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (Commission) conducts an annual harvest survey of licensed wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) hunters to determine the proportion of license holders that hunt and the estimated total harvest. The harvest survey is traditionally conducted with a mailed postcard, which is increasingly costly and time-consuming to administer. The Commission has considered using a less costly and less protracted web-based survey. From 2012 through 2014, we conducted web and mail surveys of licensed turkey hunters to compare response rates and reported rate of hunting participation. The average response rate differed between mail and web survey respondents (25.5% and 16.5%, respectively). Rates of hunting participation also differed between the survey modes; 40.5% and 61.4%, respectively, of mail and web survey respondents said that they hunted during the previous spring season. When hunting participation rates were extrapolated to the total number of license holders in the state, the projected average number of hunters across the 3 years was 17,356 (52%) greater from the web survey than the mail survey. Demographic weighting (age class, sex, ethnicity, median household income, or urbanicity) failed to account for the difference in reported hunting participation between survey modes. Our results indicated that respondents of the 2 survey modes differed fundamentally in either their hunting behavior or in their propensity to respond to the surveys, both of which have ramifications when management decisions are based on the results of harvest surveys. Although a mixed-mode survey may be a feasible option to reduce cost and still obtain accurate harvest estimates, we caution against abruptly switching from mail to web surveys given the vastly different outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Web versus Mail: The Influence of Survey Distribution Mode on Employees' Response [J].
Saunders, Mark N. K. .
FIELD METHODS, 2012, 24 (01) :56-73
[22]   Effects of objective and perceived burden on response quality in web surveys [J].
Kunz, Tanja ;
Gummer, Tobias .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2025, 28 (04) :385-395
[23]   Self-reported data in environmental health studies: mail vs. web-based surveys [J].
Cantuaria, Manuella Lech ;
Blanes-Vidal, Victoria .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (01)
[24]   The End of the (Research) World As We Know It? Understanding and Coping With Declining Response Rates to Mail Surveys [J].
Stedman, Richard C. ;
Connelly, Nancy A. ;
Heberlein, Thomas A. ;
Decker, Daniel J. ;
Allred, Shorna B. .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2019, 32 (10) :1139-1154
[25]   Differences Between RDD Telephone and ABS Mail Survey Design: Coverage, Unit Nonresponse, and Measurement Error [J].
Peytchev, Andy ;
Ridenhour, Jamie ;
Krotki, Karol .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2010, 15 :117-134
[26]   What they see is what we get - Response options for web surveys [J].
Couper, MP ;
Tourangeau, R ;
Conrad, FG ;
Crawford, SD .
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2004, 22 (01) :111-127
[27]   Effects of Respondent and Survey Characteristics on the Response Quality of an Open-Ended Attitude Question in Web Surveys [J].
Schmidt, Katharina ;
Gummer, Tobias ;
Rossmann, Joss .
METHODS DATA ANALYSES, 2020, 14 (01) :3-34
[28]   The effect of sampling mode on response rate and bias in elite surveys [J].
López M. .
Quality & Quantity, 2023, 57 (2) :1303-1319
[29]   The Use of QR Codes to Encourage Participation in Mail Push-To-Web Surveys: An Evaluation of Experiments from 2015 and 2022 [J].
Marlar, Jenny ;
Schreiner, Jon .
JOURNAL OF SURVEY STATISTICS AND METHODOLOGY, 2024, 12 (05) :1157-1173
[30]   Display of battery items in web and mail surveys: Grids versus item-by-item and radio versus wide buttons [J].
Olson, Kristen ;
Smyth, Jolene D. ;
Phillips, Angelica .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2024, 66 (01) :27-45