Measuring indoor fine particle concentrations, emission rates, and decay rates from cannabis use in a residence

被引:28
作者
Ott, Wayne R. [1 ]
Zhao, Tongke [1 ]
Cheng, Kai-Chung [1 ]
Wallace, Lance A. [1 ]
Hildemann, Lynn M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Civil & Environm Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Indoor air; Cannabis; Marijuana; PM2.5; Fine particles; Aerosol; Bong; Glass pipe; Vaping; Smoking; Cigarette; PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES; MARIJUANA; SMOKE;
D O I
10.1016/j.aeaoa.2021.100106
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Fifteen states have legalized the sales of recreational marijuana, and California has the largest sales of any state. Cannabis is most often smoked indoors, but few measurements have been made of fine particle mass concentrations produced by secondhand cannabis smoke in indoor settings. We conducted 60 controlled experiments in a 43 m(3) room of a residence, measuring PM(2.5 )concentrations, emission rates, and decay rates using real-time monitors designed to measure PM2.5 mass concentrations. We also measured the room's air exchange rate. During each experiment, an experienced smoker followed an identical puffing protocol on one of four different methods of consuming marijuana: the pre-rolled marijuana joint (24 experiments), the bong with its bowl containing marijuana buds (9 experiments), the glass pipe containing marijuana buds (9 experiments), and the commercially available electronic vaping pen with a cartridge attached containing cannabis vape liquid (9 experiments). For comparison, we used the same puffing protocol to measure the PM2.5 emissions from Marlboro cigarettes (9 experiments). The results indicated that cannabis joints produced the highest indoor PM2.5 concentrations and had the largest emission rates, compared with the other cannabis sources. The average PM2.5 emission rate of the 24 cannabis joints (7.8 mg/min) was 3.5 times the average emission rate of the Marlboro cigarettes (2.2 mg/min). The average emission rate of the cannabis bong was 67% that of the joint; the glass pipe's emission rate was 54% that of the joint, and the vaping pen's emission rate was 44% that of the joint. The differences compared to the joint were statistically significant.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, BUSINESS DAILY MARIJ
[2]  
Berg CJ, 2018, PEDIATRICS, V141, pS10, DOI [10.1542/peds.2017-1026E, 10.1542/peds.2017-1026e]
[3]   Rules regarding Marijuana and Its Use in Personal Residences: Findings from Marijuana Users and Nonusers Recruited through Social Media [J].
Berg, Carla J. ;
Buller, David B. ;
Schauer, Gillian L. ;
Windle, Michael ;
Stratton, Erin ;
Kegler, Michelle C. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 2015
[4]   A systematic review of passive exposure to cannabis [J].
Berthet, Aurelie ;
De Cesare, Mariangela ;
Favrat, Bernard ;
Sporkert, Frank ;
Augsburger, Marc ;
Thomas, Aurelien ;
Giroud, Christian .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 269 :97-112
[5]  
California Department of Public Health, 2020, LETS TALK CAN WHATS
[6]   Behaviours of psychotropic substances in indoor and outdoor environments of Rome, Italy [J].
Cecinato, Angelo ;
Balducci, Catia ;
Romagnoli, Paola ;
Perilli, Mattia .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2014, 21 (15) :9193-9200
[7]   Psychotropic substances in indoor environments [J].
Cecinato, Angelo ;
Romagnoli, Paola ;
Perilli, Mattia ;
Patriarca, Claudia ;
Balducci, Catia .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 71 :88-93
[8]   Emission rates of ultrafine and fine particles generated from human smoking of Chinese cigarettes [J].
Chen, Chen ;
Zhao, Yuejing ;
Zhao, Bin .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 194 :7-13
[9]   Prevalence of Involuntary Environmental Cannabis and Tobacco Smoke Exposure in Multi-Unit Housing [J].
Chu, Alanna K. ;
Kaufman, Pamela ;
Chaiton, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (18)
[10]   PASSIVE INHALATION OF MARIJUANA SMOKE - URINALYSIS AND ROOM AIR LEVELS OF DELTA-9-TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL [J].
CONE, EJ ;
JOHNSON, RE ;
DARWIN, WD ;
YOUSEFNEJAD, D ;
MELL, LD ;
PAUL, BD ;
MITCHELL, J .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1987, 11 (03) :89-96