Choosing a radiology workstation: Technical and clinical considerations

被引:55
作者
Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
Kallergi, Maria
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Radiol, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2423051403
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Choosing a workstation for daily use in the interpretation of digital radiologic images can be a daunting task. There are numerous products available on the market, but differentiating among them and deciding on what is best for a particular environment can be confusing and frustrating. There is no "one-size-fits-all" workstation, so users must consider a variety of factors when choosing a workstation. This review summarizes the critical elements in a radiology workstation and the characteristics one should be aware of and look for in the selection of a workstation. Issues pertaining to both hardware and software aspects of medical workstations, including interface design, are reviewed, particularly as they may affect the interpretation process.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 682
页数:12
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
*AM ASS PHYS MED T, ASS DISPL PERF MED I
[2]  
*AM COLL RAD, ACR TECHN STAND TEL
[3]  
*AM COLL RAD, ACR TECHN STAND DIG
[4]   THE DIGITAL IMAGING WORKSTATION [J].
ARENSON, RL ;
CHAKRABORTY, DP ;
SESHADRI, SB ;
KUNDEL, HL .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (02) :303-315
[5]   AAPM/RSNA tutorial on equipment selection: PACS equipment overview - Display systems [J].
Badano, A .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2004, 24 (03) :879-889
[6]   Overcoming obstacles to work-changing technology such as PACS and voice recognition [J].
Bramson, RT ;
Bramson, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (06) :1727-1730
[7]  
Cavagna Enrico, 2003, Radiol Med, V105, P205
[8]   Optimization of viewing conditions and phantom image quality evaluations on GE DMR and full-field digital mammography system [J].
Chakrabarti, K ;
Thomas, JA ;
Kaczmarek, RV ;
Waynant, RW ;
Loscocco, MF .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2000, 13 (02) :226-227
[9]   Effects of pixel size on classification of microcalcifications on digitized mammograms [J].
Chan, HP ;
Sahiner, B ;
Petrick, N ;
Lam, KL ;
Helvie, MA .
MEDICAL IMAGING 1996: IMAGE PROCESSING, 1996, 2710 :30-41
[10]  
CHANDRASEKHAR R, 1999, P 1 JOINT BMES EMBS