Relationship Between Mandibular Anatomy and the Occurrence of a Bad Split Upon Sagittal Split Osteotomy

被引:44
作者
Aarabi, Mohammadali [1 ]
Tabrizi, Reza [1 ]
Hekmat, Mina [2 ]
Shahidi, Shoaleh [3 ]
Puzesh, Ayatollah [4 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Shiraz Dent Fac, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Biomat Res Ctr, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Shiraz, Iran
[4] Yasouj Univ Med Sci, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Yasuj, Iran
关键词
3-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RAMUS; FRACTURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: A bad split is a troublesome complication of the sagittal split osteotomy (SSO). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between the occurrence of a bad split and mandibular anatomy in SSO using cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: The authors designed a cohort retrospective study. Forty-eight patients (96 SSO sites) were studied. The buccolingual thickness of the retromandibular area (BLR), the buccolingual thickness of the ramus at the level of the lingula (BLTR), the height of the mandible from the alveolar crest to the inferior border of the mandible, (ACIB), the distance between the sigmoid notch and the inferior border of the mandible (SIBM), and the anteroposterior width of the ramus (APWR) were measured. The independent t test was applied to compare anatomic measurements between the group with and the group without bad splits. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) test was used to find a cutoff point in anatomic size for various parts of the mandible related to the occurrence of bad splits. Results: The mean SIBM was 47.05 +/- 6.33 mm in group 1 (with bad splits) versus 40.66 +/- 2.44 mm in group 2 (without bad splits; P = .01). The mean BLTR was 5.74 +/- 1.11 mm in group 1 versus 3.19 +/- 0.55 mm in group 2 (P = .04). The mean BLR was 14.98 +/- 2.78 mm in group 1 versus 11.21 +/- 1.29 mm in group 2 (P = .001). No statistically significant difference was found for APWR and ACIB between the 2 groups. The ROC test showed cutoff points of 10.17 mm for BLR, 36.69 mm for SIBM, and 4.06 mm for BLTR. Conclusion: This study showed that certain mandibular anatomic differences can increase the risk of a bad split during SSO surgery. (C) 2014 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:2508 / 2513
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Pilot study of modification of the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) in pig mandibles [J].
Bockmann, Roland ;
Schoen, Patrick ;
Frotscher, Matthias ;
Eggeler, Gunther ;
Lethaus, Bernd ;
Wolff, Klaus-Dietrich .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 39 (03) :169-172
[2]  
CARLETON AS, 1986, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V44, P81
[3]   Risk factors and prevention of bad splits during sagittal split osteotomy [J].
Chrcanovic B.R. ;
Freire-Maia B. .
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2012, 16 (1) :19-27
[4]  
DAL PONT G, 1961, J Oral Surg Anesth Hosp Dent Serv, V19, P42
[5]  
EPKER BN, 1977, J ORAL SURG, V35, P157
[6]  
Epker BN, 1986, INTEGRATED ORTHODONT, V1
[7]   Occurrence of bad splits during sagittal split osteotomy [J].
Falter, Bart ;
Schepers, Serge ;
Vrielinck, Luc ;
Lambrichts, Ivo ;
Thijs, Herbert ;
Politis, Constantinus .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2010, 110 (04) :430-435
[8]   SEQUELAE AND COMPLICATIONS OF INTRAORAL SAGITTAL OSTEOTOMY IN MANDIBULAR RAMI [J].
GUERNSEY, LH ;
DECHAMPLAIN, RW .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 1971, 32 (02) :176-+
[9]   Postoperative imaging of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures using digital volume tomography [J].
Heiland, M ;
Schulze, DK ;
Rother, U ;
Schmelzle, R .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 62 (11) :1387-1391
[10]  
Hunsuck E E, 1968, J Oral Surg, V26, P250