Foreign Policy Orientation and Electoral Behavior: Analyzing Opinion Polls in Belarus, Georgia, and Kazakhstan br

被引:0
作者
Okunev, I. Yu. [1 ]
Shestakova, M. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] MGIMO Univ Address, Inst Int Studies, Ctr Spatial Anal Int Relat, Vernadsky Ave 76, Moscow 119454, Russia
[2] MGIMO Univ, Dept Masters Training, Dept Comparat Polit Sci, Vernadsky Ave 76, Moscow 119454, Russia
来源
MGIMO REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS | 2022年 / 15卷 / 06期
关键词
electoral geography; post-Soviet space; Belarus; Georgia; Kazakhstan; sociological survey; foreign policy orientation; NOSTALGIA; IDENTITY; RUSSIA; SPACE; STATE;
D O I
10.24833/2071-8160-2022-6-87-55-85
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
In the post-pandemic years of 2021-2022, the post-Soviet space has entered a stage of decisive transformation, which will test the maturity of the state institutions formed 30 years ago for the region's countries. The study captures a snapshot of public sentiment in these countries on the eve of this wave of transformation - it is based on a series of large-scale opinion polls in Belarus, Georgia and Kazakhstan, conducted immediately after the last elections to the lower houses of the parliaments of these countries in the pre-crisis era. The main research question of the sociological study was to identify demographic and geo-graphical patterns in determining the attitude of voters toward the prospects for relations with Russia. Countries with traditionally different strategies of relations with Russia were taken: Belarus is a strategic ally, Kazakhstan is friendly but pursues a multi-vector policy, and Georgia is generally hostile at the level of the political class. The analysis showed that in matters of orientation towards positive relations with Russia, the voters of these countries nevertheless had more in common than differences. Based on the analysis results, several lines of delimitation can be distinguished. Firstly, the "macro-regional, geopolitical" line runs between Belarus and Kazakhstan, on the one hand, and Georgia, on the other. The second split along the "center-periphery" line takes place within states, i.e., Such a demarcation was singled out by many researchers, singled out concerning Russia; however, we found the same demarcations in Belarus ("Minsk and the rest of the country") partly in Georgia and Ka-zakhstan. Finally, the authors admit to it the possibility of delimitation along the north-south lines: in Georgia and, to some extent, in Kazakhstan, as a result of territorial differentiation in the residence of Russians in the northern regions of the republic, where sympathy for Russia is more clearly manifested than in the southern regions remote from it; and this demarcation is less pronounced in Belarus, where it refers to the regions bordering Russia and Ukraine.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 85
页数:31
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Akhremenko AS, 2005, POLIS, P26
[2]   Image theory, social identity, and social dominance: Structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images [J].
Alexander, MG ;
Levin, S ;
Henry, PJ .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 26 (01) :27-45
[3]  
Belanovsky S.A, 2019, GLUBOKOE INTERVYU FO
[4]  
Bonine Michael E., IS THERE MIDDLE E EV
[5]  
Boulding K., 1959, J CONFLICT RESOLUT, V3, P120
[6]  
Bryman A., 2012, METODY SOCIALNYH ISS
[7]   National Images as Integrated Schemas: Subliminal Primes of Image Attributes Shape Foreign Policy Preferences [J].
Castano, Emanuele ;
Bonacossa, Alain ;
Gries, Peter .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 37 (03) :351-366
[8]  
Deutsch KarlW., 1957, POLITICAL COMMUNITY
[9]   GEOGRAPHY OF ELECTORAL VOLATILITY IN THE WARMIA AND MAZURY VOIVODESHIP OF POLAND [J].
Fidrya, E. ;
Tarasov, I. .
BALTIC REGION, 2016, (04) :78-89