Combining analytical hierarchy process and Choquet integral within non-additive robust ordinal regression

被引:53
作者
Corrente, Salvatore [1 ]
Greco, Salvatore [1 ,2 ]
Ishizaka, Alessio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catania, Dept Econ & Business, Corso Italia 55, I-95129 Catania, Italy
[2] Univ Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business Sch, CORL, Richmond Bldg,Portland St, Portsmouth PO1 3DE, Hants, England
来源
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE | 2016年 / 61卷
关键词
Multiple criteria decision aiding; Interaction between criteria; Choquet integral; Analytical hierarchy process; Non-additive robust ordinal regression; NUMBER; 7; DECISION; CRITERIA; UTILITY; CAPACITIES; AGGREGATION; PRIORITIES; MODEL; PLUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2015.07.003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We consider multiple criteria decision aiding in the case of interaction between criteria. In this case the usual weighted sum cannot be used to aggregate evaluations on different criteria and other value functions with a more complex formulation have to be considered. The Choquet integral is the most used technique and also the most widespread in the literature. However, the application of the Choquet integral presents two main problems being the necessity to determine the capacity, which is the function that assigns a weight not only to all single criteria but also to all subset of criteria, and the necessity to express on the, same scale evaluations on different criteria. While with respect to the first problem we adopt the recently introduced Non-Additive Robust Ordinal Regression (NAROR) taking into account all the capacities compatible with the preference information provided by the DM, with respect to the second one we build the common scale for the considered criteria using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). We propose to use AHP on a set of reference points in the scale of each criterion and to use an interpolation to obtain the other values. This permits to reduce considerably the number of pairwise comparisons usually required by the DM when applying AHP. An illustrative example details the application of the proposed methodology. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 18
页数:17
相关论文
共 71 条
[11]   A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP [J].
Bana E Costa, Carlos A. ;
Vansnick, Jean-Claude .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 187 (03) :1422-1428
[12]  
Bana eCosta., 1994, INT T OPER RES, V1, P489, DOI DOI 10.1016/0969-6016(94)90010-8
[13]   MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY-FUNCTIONS - DECOMPOSITIONS USING INTERPOLATION [J].
BELL, DE .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1979, 25 (08) :744-753
[14]   Towards an aggregation performance measurement system model in a supply chain context [J].
Berrah, Lamia ;
Cliville, Vincent .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2007, 58 (07) :709-719
[15]   Inconsistency and non-additive capacities: The Analytic Hierarchy Process in the framework of Choquet integration [J].
Bortot, Silvia ;
Pereira, Ricardo Alberto Marques .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2013, 213 :6-26
[16]   A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD - (THE PROMETHEE METHOD FOR MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING) [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, PH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (06) :647-656
[17]   SOME CHARACTERIZATIONS OF LOWER PROBABILITIES AND OTHER MONOTONE CAPACITIES THROUGH THE USE OF MOBIUS-INVERSION [J].
CHATEAUNEUF, A ;
JAFFRAY, JY .
MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1989, 17 (03) :263-283
[18]  
Choquet G., 1953, Ann. Institute. Fourier (Grenoble), V5, P131, DOI DOI 10.5802/AIF.53
[19]  
Corrente S., 2014, WILEY ENCY OPERATION, P1
[20]   Dealing with interaction between bipolar multiple criteria preferences in PROMETHEE methods [J].
Corrente, Salvatore ;
Figueira, Jose Rui ;
Greco, Salvatore .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2014, 217 (01) :137-164