Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications

被引:18
作者
Delgado, Mario Amin Salgado [1 ]
Usai, Lorenzo [1 ]
Pan, Qiaoyan [2 ]
Stromman, Anders Hammer [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Ind Ecol Program, E1 Hogskoleringen 5, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] ACCUREC Recycling GmbH, Bataverstr 21, DE-47809 Krefeld, Germany
关键词
industrial ecology; life cycle assessment; aluminium-ion; lithium-ion; cradle-to-grave; stationary battery; decentralized energy systems; ELECTRIC VEHICLE-BATTERIES; LITHIUM-ION; ENERGY-STORAGE; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; 2ND LIFE; SYSTEMS; EMISSIONS; HYBRID; ACID;
D O I
10.3390/ma12193270
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The foreseen high penetration of fluctuant renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, will cause an increased need for batteries to store the energy produced and not instantaneously consumed. Due to the high production cost and significant environmental impacts associated with the production of lithium-ion nickel-manganese-cobalt (Li-ion NMC) batteries, several chemistries are proposed as a potential substitute. This study aims to identify and compare the lifecycle environmental impacts springing from a novel Al-ion battery, with the current state-of-the-art chemistry, i.e., Li-ion NMC. The global warming potential (GWP) indicator was selected to express the results due to its relevance to society, policy and to facilitate the comparison of our results with other research. The cradle-to-grave process-based assessment uses two functional units: (1) per-cell manufactured and (2) per-Wh of storage capacity. The results identified the battery's production as the highest carbon intensity phase, being the energy usage the main contributor to GWP. In general, the materials and process involved in the manufacturing and recycling of the novel battery achieve a lower environmental impact in comparison to the Li-ion technology. However, due to the Al-ion's low energy density, a higher amount of materials are needed to deliver equivalent performance than a Li-ion.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ENV MAN LIF CYCL ASS, V2nd
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Okobilanz von Lithium-Ionen Batterien
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Conversation with Steve Reich
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, APPL LIFE CYCLE ASSE
[5]   CO2 Footprint and Life-Cycle Costs of Electrochemical Energy Storage for Stationary Grid Applications [J].
Baumann, M. ;
Peters, J. F. ;
Weil, M. ;
Grunwald, A. .
ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 5 (07) :1071-1083
[6]   Second life batteries lifespan: Rest of useful life and environmental analysis [J].
Canals Casals, Lluc ;
Amante Garcia, B. ;
Canal, Camille .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 232 :354-363
[7]   Second life of electric vehicle batteries: relation between materials degradation and environmental impact [J].
Canals Casals, Lluc ;
Amante Garcia, Beatriz ;
Aguesse, Frederic ;
Iturrondobeitia, Amaia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (01) :82-93
[8]   The ultimate water-treatment plant? [J].
Chaffey, Nigel .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2010, 105 (04) :VI-VI
[9]   A novel non-aqueous aluminum sulfur battery [J].
Cohn, Gil ;
Ma, Lin ;
Archer, Lynden A. .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2015, 283 :416-422
[10]   Sodium and Sodium-Ion Batteries: 50 Years of Research [J].
Delmas, Claude .
ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS, 2018, 8 (17)