Commodity crops in biodiversity-rich production landscapes: Friends or foes? The example of cotton in the Mid Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe

被引:5
作者
Baudron, Frederic
Guerrini, Laure [1 ]
Chimimba, Edmore [2 ]
Chimusimbe, Edwin [2 ]
Giller, Ken E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Cooperat Int Rech Agron Dev, 6 Lanark Rd, Harare, Zimbabwe
[2] Mushumbi Pools, Harare, Zimbabwe
[3] Wageningen Univ, Plant Prod Syst, POB 430, NL-6700 AK Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Cash crops; Land-use change; Land sparing; Land sharing; Human-wildlife conflicts; AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION; CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE; AFRICAN SAVANNAS; PROTECTED AREAS; LAND; TRADE; POPULATION; DEFORESTATION; EXPANSION; COUNTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109496
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The production and trade of agricultural commodities is a major driver of the loss of tropical biodiversity. In the Mid Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe, which is home to many emblematic African mammals, cotton production has historically been a major driver of land cover change. The collapse of cotton production in Zimbabwe over the last decade provides a unique opportunity to understand the linkages between the profitability of cotton and land-use changes in this multifunctional landscape. By re-visiting 141 households that had been surveyed in 2007 and combining this panel survey data with a land cover analysis and secondary data, we demonstrate that the decreasing profitability of cotton led to a shift from cotton farming (mean area per farm decreasing from 1.79 +/- 2.05 ha in 2007 to 0.72 +/- 0.90 ha in 2020) to livestock farming (mean number of cattle and goats per farm increasing several-fold between 2007 and 2020), resulting in drastic land cover changes. Indeed, open vegetation (including crops, fallows and grazing areas) expanded from 10 to 20% of the total land cover area between 2007 and 2020. Populations of wildlife species have declined drastically during this period, although this cannot be attributed solely to the observed changes in land cover. However, increasing human-wildlife conflicts are likely to threaten the long-term coexistence of people and wildlife in the area. We argue that commodity crops can be an opportunity for nature conservation, not only a threat, and that conservation needs to support a `living income' for people coexisting with wildlife.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
[31]  
Giller KE, 2013, TRANSFRONTIER CONSERVATION AREAS: PEOPLE LIVING ON THE EDGE, P62
[32]  
Girard M.-C., 1999, Traitement des donn��es de t��l��d��tection
[33]   Cash cropping and food crop productivity: synergies or trade-offs? [J].
Govereh, J ;
Jayne, TS .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 28 (01) :39-50
[34]   Farming and the fate of wild nature [J].
Green, RE ;
Cornell, SJ ;
Scharlemann, JPW ;
Balmford, A .
SCIENCE, 2005, 307 (5709) :550-555
[35]   Threats posed to conservation by media misinformation [J].
Hart, Adam G. ;
Cooney, Rosie ;
Dickman, Amy ;
Hare, Darragh ;
Jonga, Charles ;
Johnson, Paul K. ;
Louis, Maxi Pia ;
Lubilo, Rodgers ;
Roe, Dilys ;
Semcer, Catherine ;
Somerville, Keith .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2020, 34 (06) :1333-1334
[36]  
Hulme D., 1999, Journal of International Development, V11, P277, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199903/04)11:2<277::AID-JID582>3.0.CO
[37]  
2-T
[38]   Comparison of aerial counts with ground counts for large African herbivores [J].
Jachmann, H .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2002, 39 (05) :841-852
[39]  
Kooistra K.J., 2006, SUSTAINABILITY COTTO
[40]  
Kupika O.L., 2017, Selected studies in biodiversity