How Should We Define Clinically Significant Improvement on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test for Patients Undergoing Knee Meniscal Surgery?

被引:31
作者
Okoroha, Kelechi R. [1 ]
Lu, Yining [1 ]
Nwachukwu, Benedict U. [1 ]
Beletsky, Alexander [1 ]
Patel, Bhavik H. [1 ]
Verma, Nikhil N. [1 ]
Cole, Brian [1 ]
Forsythe, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Div Sports Med, Midwest Orthopaed Rush, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ACCEPTABLE SYMPTOM STATE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; MINIMALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; FOLLOW-UP; PHYSICAL-FUNCTION; ARTHROSCOPIC TREATMENT; TOTAL HIP; PROMIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.036
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) thresholds for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) computerized adaptive test (CAT) instrument in patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscal surgery. Methods: The PROMIS PF CAT was administered preoperatively and postoperatively to patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscal surgery. At 6 months postoperatively, patients graded their knee function based on a domain-specific anchor question. A satisfaction anchor question was used to indicate achievement of the PASS. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined the relevant psychometric values. Cutoff analysis was performed to find preoperative patient-reported outcome scores predicting achievement of clinically significant outcomes (CSOs). Results: A total of 73 patients (41.1% female patients) were included, with a mean age of 44.9 +/- 12.8.0 years and average follow-up period of 24.0 +/- 1.2 weeks. The MCID on the PROMIS PF CAT was calculated to be 2.09 (area under the curve [AUG], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-0.94). Net score improvement equivalent to achievement of SCB was found to be 6.50 (AUC, 0.77; 95% CL 0.55-0.99). The PASS was found to be 46.1 (AUC, 0.86; 95% CL 0.76-0.96). A preoperative score below 37.6 on the PROMIS PF CAT predicted achievement of the MCID (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.87), whereas scores above 41.9 predicted achievement of the PASS (AUC, 0.77; 95% CL 0.65-0.90). Higher baseline functional status and the absence of pre-existing arthritis were also found to be statistically significant predictors of achieving C SOs. Conclusions: Our study defined the MCID, SCB, and PASS for the PROMIS PF CAT. We found that a preoperative score below 37.6 was predictive of achieving a meaningful clinical change with surgery whereas a preoperative score above 41.9 was predictive of patients who would attain an acceptable postoperative health state. In addition, exercising more days per week and the absence of arthritis increased the likelihood of achieving postoperative CSOs.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 250
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[51]   Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy versus Sham Surgery for a Degenerative Meniscal Tear [J].
Sihvonen, Raine ;
Paavola, Mika ;
Malmivaara, Antti ;
Itala, Ari ;
Joukainen, Antti ;
Nurmi, Heikki ;
Kalske, Juha ;
Jarvinen, Teppo L. N. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (26) :2515-2524
[52]   Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference [J].
Simovitch, Ryan ;
Flurin, Pierre-Henri ;
Wright, Thomas ;
Zuckerman, Joseph D. ;
Roche, Christopher P. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (02) :298-305
[53]   Development of the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Gastrointestinal Symptom Scales [J].
Spiegel, Brennan M. R. ;
Hays, Ron D. ;
Bolus, Roger ;
Melmed, Gil Y. ;
Chang, Lin ;
Whitman, Cynthia ;
Khanna, Puja P. ;
Paz, Sylvia H. ;
Hays, Tonya ;
Reise, Steve ;
Khanna, Dinesh .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 (11) :1804-1814
[54]   Estimating minimally important difference (MID) in PROMIS pediatric measures using the scale-judgment method [J].
Thissen, David ;
Liu, Yang ;
Magnus, Brooke ;
Quinn, Hally ;
Gipson, Debbie S. ;
Dampier, Carlton ;
Huang, I-Chan ;
Hinds, Pamela S. ;
Selewski, David T. ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Gross, Heather E. ;
DeWalt, Darren A. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (01) :13-23
[55]   Patient reported outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for traumatic or degenerative meniscal tears: comparative prospective cohort study [J].
Thorlund, Jonas Bloch ;
Englund, Martin ;
Christensen, Robin ;
Nissen, Nis ;
Pihl, Kenneth ;
Jorgensen, Uffe ;
Schjerning, Jeppe ;
Lohmander, L. Stefan .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356
[56]   What Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score Represents a Clinically Important Change After Shoulder Arthroplasty? [J].
Werner, Brian C. ;
Chang, Brenda ;
Nguyen, Joseph T. ;
Dines, David M. ;
Gulotta, Lawrence V. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2016, 474 (12) :2672-2681
[57]   Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients [J].
Yost, Kathleen J. ;
Eton, David T. ;
Garcia, Sofia F. ;
Cella, David .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (05) :507-516
[58]   Establishing Maximal Medical Improvement After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair [J].
Zuke, William A. ;
Leroux, Timothy S. ;
Gregory, Bonnie P. ;
Black, Austin ;
Forsythe, Brian ;
Romeo, Anthony A. ;
Verma, Nikhil N. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (04) :1000-1007