Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy footprints of utility-scale solar energy systems

被引:44
|
作者
Mehedi, Tanveer Hassan [1 ]
Gemechu, Eskinder [1 ]
Kumar, Amit [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Mech Engn, 10-263 Donadeo Innovat Ctr Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
关键词
Energy payback time; Greenhouse gas emissions; Life cycle assessment; Net energy ratio; Solar energy; Utility scale; PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER-GENERATION; LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES; RENEWABLE ENERGY; PV SYSTEMS; ELECTRICITY; STORAGE; CHALLENGES; IMPACTS; MODULES; HYBRID;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118918
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Grid-connected utility-scale solar PV has emerged as a potential pathway to ensure deep decarbonization of electricity in regions with fossil fuel-dominated energy mixes. Research on utility-scale solar PV projects mainly focuses on assessing technical or economic feasibility. Environmental performance assessments of large-scale solar applications are scarce. There is limited information on the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy footprints of utility-scale solar energy systems. Earlier studies conducted on small-scale solar systems have limited application in the grid system. We developed a comprehensive bottom-up life cycle assessment model to evaluate the life cycle GHG emissions and energy profiles of utility-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) system with lithium-ion battery storage to provide a consistent electricity supply to the grid with peak load options. We conducted a case study for a fossil fuel-based energy jurisdiction, Alberta (a western province in Canada). The results of the energy assessment show that raw material extraction, production, and assembly of solar panels are the key drivers, accounting for 53% of the total consumption. Energy consumed during battery manufacturing is responsible for 28%. The system shows a net energy production with a mean net energy ratio as high as 6.6 for two-axis sun tracking orientation. The life cycle GHG emissions range from 98.3 to 149.3 g CO2 eq /kWh with a mean value of 123.8 g CO2 eq /kWh. The largest emissions contribution is due to the manufacturing of batteries, 54% of the total emissions. The solar PV system offers a mean energy payback time of 3.8 years (with a range of 3.3 to 4.2 years). The results are highly sensitive to the expected lifetime of the system, the panel's peak wattage, and process energy consumption at various life cycle stages.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Support for solar energy: Examining sense of place and utility-scale development in California
    Carlisle, Juliet E.
    Kane, Stephanie L.
    Solan, David
    Joe, Jeffrey C.
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 3 : 113 - 119
  • [22] Alternative water resources for utility-scale solar energy development
    Murphy, D. J.
    O'Connor, B. L.
    Mayhorn, D. T.
    Almer, L. I.
    Bowen, E. E.
    White, E. M.
    Kim, C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOLARPACES 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2014, 49 : 2501 - 2511
  • [23] Energy mix-driven dynamic life cycle assessment on greenhouse gas emissions of passenger cars in China
    Lu, Yu
    Liu, Qiang
    Li, Bo
    Jiang, Qiong
    Li, Qing
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 466
  • [24] Life cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of urban residential buildings in Guangzhou city
    Zhan, Jinyan
    Liu, Wei
    Wu, Feng
    Li, Zhihui
    Wang, Chao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 194 : 318 - 326
  • [25] Life cycle net energy and greenhouse gas emissions of photosynthetic cyanobacterial biorefineries: Challenges for industrial production of biofuels
    Quiroz-Arita, Carlos
    Sheehan, John J.
    Bradley, Thomas H.
    ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2017, 26 : 445 - 452
  • [26] Life cycle assessment of two emerging sewage sludge-to-energy systems: Evaluating energy and greenhouse gas emissions implications
    Cao, Yucheng
    Pawlowski, Artur
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 127 : 81 - 91
  • [27] A taxonomy of systems that combine utility-scale renewable energy and energy storage technologies
    Murphy, C. A.
    Schleifer, A.
    Eurek, K.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 139 (139)
  • [28] Utility-Scale Shared Energy Storage
    Ben-Idris, Mohammed
    Brown, Michael
    Egan, Matthew
    Huang, Zhenyu
    Mitra, Joydeep
    IEEE ELECTRIFICATION MAGAZINE, 2021, 9 (04): : 47 - 54
  • [29] Optimum penetration of regional utility-scale renewable energy systems
    Jo, J. H.
    Aldeman, M. R.
    Loomis, D. G.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 118 : 328 - 334
  • [30] Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and net energy assessment of large-scale hydrogen production via electrolysis and solar PV
    Palmer, Graham
    Roberts, Ashley
    Hoadley, Andrew
    Dargaville, Roger
    Honnery, Damon
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 14 (10) : 5113 - 5131