Monetary valuation in Life Cycle Assessment: a review

被引:186
作者
Pizzol, Massimo [1 ]
Weidema, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Brandao, Miguel [2 ]
Osset, Philippe [3 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Dev & Planning, Danish Ctr Environm Assessment, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
[2] 2 0 LCA Consultants, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
[3] SCORELCA, F-69603 Villeurbanne, France
关键词
Monetary valuation; Externality; Life cycle assessment; Weighting; ECONOMIC VALUATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; BIODIVERSITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Monetary valuation is the practice of converting measures of social and biophysical impacts into monetary units and is used to determine the economic value of non-market goods, i.e. goods for which no market exists. It is applied in cost benefit analysis to enable the cross-comparison between different impacts and/or with other econoinic costs and benefits. For this reason, monetary valuation has a great potential to be applied also in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), especially in the weighting phase. However, several challenges limit its diffusion in the field, which resulted in only a few applications so far. The authors have performed a review of different monetary valuation methods for use in LCA. Firstly, monetary valuation approaches, methods, and LCA applications were identified. Secondly, key features and the strengths and weaknesses of each monetary valuation method were determined. Finally, monetary valuation methods and LCA applications were evaluated according to a comprehensive set of criteria, ranging from scientific foundation to uncertainty and complexity. It was found that observed-and revealed-preference methods and the abatement cost method have limited applicability in LCA, whereas the choice experiment method and the budget constraint method are the best options for monetary valuation in LCA. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 179
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   The use of valuation and weighting sets in environmental impact assessment [J].
Ahlroth, Sofia .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2014, 85 :34-41
[2]   Ecovalue08-A new valuation set for environmental systems analysis tools [J].
Ahlroth, Sofia ;
Finnveden, Goran .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (17-18) :1994-2003
[3]   Weighting and valuation in selected environmental systems analysis tools - suggestions for further developments [J].
Ahlroth, Sofia ;
Nilsson, Mans ;
Finnveden, Goran ;
Hjelm, Olof ;
Hochschorner, Elisabeth .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (2-3) :145-156
[4]   Monetary Valuation with Impact Pathway Analysis: Benefits of Reducing Nitrate Leaching in European Catchments [J].
Andersen, Mikael Skou ;
Hansen, Morten Soes ;
Carstensen, Jacob ;
Kronvang, Brian ;
Andersen, Hans Estrup ;
Thodsen, Hans .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 5 (03) :199-244
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ExternE: Externalities of Energy, Methodology 2005 Update
[6]  
Bachmann T.M., 2011, ENCY ENV HLTH, P264
[7]   Valuing ecosystem services as productive inputs [J].
Barbier, Edward B. .
ECONOMIC POLICY, 2007, (49) :178-229
[8]  
Boardman A.E., 2006, Cost-benefit analysis, concepts and practice, V3rd
[9]   The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].
Costanza, R ;
dArge, R ;
deGroot, R ;
Farber, S ;
Grasso, M ;
Hannon, B ;
Limburg, K ;
Naeem, S ;
ONeill, RV ;
Paruelo, J ;
Raskin, RG ;
Sutton, P ;
vandenBelt, M .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :253-260
[10]   Monetary valuation of emissions in implementing environmental policy - The reduction cost approach based upon policy targets [J].
Davidson, MD ;
Boon, BH ;
van Swigchem, J .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2005, 9 (04) :145-154