Randomized, double-blind trial comparing the antiemetic effect of tropisetron plus metopimazine with tropisetron plus placebo in patients receiving multiple cycles of multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy

被引:15
作者
Herrstedt, J. [6 ]
Sigsgaard, T. C.
Nielsen, H. A.
Handberg, J.
Langer, S. W.
Ottesen, S.
Dombernowsky, P.
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Dept Oncol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, HS Rigshosp, Dept Oncol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Hillerod Hosp, Dept Internal Med E, Hillerod, Denmark
[4] Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Internal Med P, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Roskilde Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Roskilde, Denmark
[6] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol 54 B1, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
关键词
antiemetics; metopimazine; multiple-day cisplatin; multiple cycles; tropisetron;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-006-0158-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the antiemetic efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron plus metopimazine with tropisetron plus placebo during 4 cycles of multiple-day, cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Materials and methods: 82 chemotherapy-naive patients with germ cell cancer scheduled to 4 cycles of multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy (20 or 40 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days) given every 3 weeks were included. A double-blind parallel trial design was used and patients randomized to tropisetron plus metopimazine or tropisetron plus placebo. Tropisetron was administered as a single 5 mg intravenous dose on days 1-5 and a single 5 mg oral dose on day 6, and metopimazine as 30 mg orally t.i.d. on day 1, and q.i.d on days 2-6. Results: Patients were evaluable for efficacy during a total of 195 cycles. Small, but certain advantages were obtained with the combination. In cycle 1, complete protection from emetic episodes on day 1, days 1-5, days 6-9 and days 1-9 was achieved in 85.7%, 42.9%, 86.2% and 40.5% with tropisetron plus metopimazine and in 90.0%, 22.5%, 64.3% and 17.5% with tropisetron plus placebo, respectively. This difference achieved statistical significance in the overall period, days 1-9 (P = 0.029). During the entire period (days 1-9), significantly less nausea was seen in patients receiving tropisetron plus metopimazine (P = 0.027), whereas other nausea parameters did not reach statistical significance. The cumulative emetic protection rate after 4 cycles was 0.51 with tropisetron plus metopimazine and 0.25 with tropisetron plus placebo (P = 0.037). Side effects were generally few and mild with both treatments and no significant differences were seen. Conclusion: Tropisetron plus metopimazine is superior to tropisetron during 4 cycles of multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy, but both treatments are ineffective in a number of patients. The effect of the combination seems comparable to that of ondansetron plus dexamethasone. Newer drugs such as the neurokinin, receptor antagonist, aprepitant, should be investigated to optimize antiemetic therapy in patients receiving multiple-day chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 426
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
BLIJHAM GH, 1992, EJC SUPPL, V28, P17
[3]   The oral NK1 antagonist, aprepitant, given with standard antiemetics provides protection against nausea and vomiting over multiple cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy:: a combined analysis of two randomised, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trials [J].
de Wit, R ;
Herrstedt, J ;
Rapoport, B ;
Carides, AD ;
Guoguang-Ma, J ;
Elmer, M ;
Schmidt, C ;
Evans, JK ;
Horgan, KJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (03) :403-410
[4]   Analysis of cumulative probabilities shows that the efficacy of 5HT(3) antagonist prophylaxis is not maintained [J].
deWit, R ;
Schmitz, PIM ;
Verweij, J ;
deBoerDennert, M ;
deMulder, PHM ;
Planting, AST ;
vanderBurg, MEL ;
Stoter, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (02) :644-651
[5]   Antiemetic therapy for multiple-day chemotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplant: review and consensus statement [J].
Einhorn, LH ;
Rapoport, B ;
Koeller, J ;
Grunberg, SM ;
Feyer, P ;
Rittenberg, C ;
Aapro, M .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2005, 13 (02) :112-116
[6]   ONDANSETRON VERSUS ONDANSETRON, DEXAMETHASONE, AND CHLORPROMAZINE IN THE PREVENTION OF NAUSEA AND VOMITING ASSOCIATED WITH MULTIPLE-DAY CISPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
FOX, SM ;
EINHORN, LH ;
COX, E ;
POWELL, N ;
ABDY, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (12) :2391-2395
[7]  
*GRAN STUD GROUP, 1993, J CANC RES CLIN ONCO
[8]   Evaluation of new antiemetic agents and definition of antineoplastic agent emetogenicity - an update [J].
Grunberg, SM ;
Osoba, D ;
Hesketh, PJ ;
Gralla, RJ ;
Borjeson, S ;
Rapoport, BL ;
du Bois, A ;
Tonato, M .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2005, 13 (02) :80-84
[9]  
HAID M, 1981, NEW ENGL J MED, V304, P1237
[10]   ONDANSETRON PLUS METOPIMAZINE COMPARED WITH ONDANSETRON ALONE IN PATIENTS RECEIVING MODERATELY EMETOGENIC CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
HERRSTEDT, J ;
SIGSGAARD, T ;
BOESGAARD, M ;
JENSEN, TP ;
DOMBERNOWSKY, P .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 328 (15) :1076-1080